Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
For years, the classical desktop has been the main interface for interacting with computers. Consisting of a menu, a panel, and an area to display widgets and open windows, its main virtue was originally its easy access to applications and files. It remains popular today, featured in at least five of the seven major Linux desktop environments. Increasingly, though, it is becoming inefficient -- a trend that is not helped helped by experimental designs that decrease access to resources rather than increasing it.
One solution, which Unity encourages, is to focus on personal documents, displaying their icons, and clicking them to open the applications they run in. This approach has the advantage of launching applications with fewer clicks, but the disadvantage that, in the case of games and utilities, users still need to launch the application.
This is perhaps the dumbest thing i have read in one of these "news" links. Sure i want a computer that will read my mind, could somebody start working on that?
Part of the problem, if there really is a problem, is that the modern DE's have become so heavy with gee-whiz bells and whistles, that add nothing to usability, that they in themselves present a barrier to ease of use.
The old WM plus a few independent widgets and maybe a panel, plus a terminal is far and away more easy to use than recent versions of Gnome and KDE. Ease of use may come at the price of dropping the gee whiz factor and the hundreds of options and tweaks in which DE's seem bound to bury themselves.
I agree with fogpipe about the bells and whistles. Fluxbox and Enlightenment are desktop-y enough for me.
This "everything has to look like a phone/tablet" notion just leaves me cold; on a computer screen, it's neither functional nor efficient. Plus I like my overlapping windows. Also, get off my lawn.
As for the article, the kindest thing I can say is that someone must have had a deadline to meet.
I was going to throw a whatever and and then a screenshot of my IBM P3 T23 Icewm install
when I read this. But then thought I was the only one that felt this way.
Classical desktop is one way of abstraction to do things easily, simple, elegant, working, useful. It is not going to get outdated. If the author likes something else let him go/change to other interfaces.
Classical desktop is one way of abstraction to do things easily, simple, elegant, working, useful. It is not going to get outdated. If the author likes something else let him go/change to other interfaces.
Agreed. The classic desktop is still completely functional if you keep it "CLASSIC" and not "filled with so much garbage you can't even find your programs".
I use KDE with none of the geewhizzery that is available (traditional kmenu, no desktop widgets, basic panel) and it simply works, and works well, even on my 6 year old laptop (which is the one I'm on currently).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.