Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Wouldn't parsing all the words in all the posts also add an unnecessary load to the server(s)? I honestly don't know what kind of volume of data LQ has to cope with every day.
From the few comments I've seen around here over the years, it is a huge amount of data. Probably way to much to allow any filtering. Hey, I was just dreaming.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn
Okay, just what is wrong with satiric misspellings? It seems as though none of you know anything about them.
Believe it or not, the majority of us here probably are very familiar with the idea. One of the nice features of LQ is that most members use that stuff between their ears for purposes other than structural support. What chaps my hide about the constant "satirical" misspellings is that they are old, boring, hackneyed, and generally don't contribute to the overall quality of the discourse. Absolutely zero original thought goes into them, and they never make a point that couldn't be made in a much better fashion by using plain old English.
We all know that Microsoft and Adobe are all about $£, ie. making money. Kenny, I know that you're a teenager and probably too young to know it, but I'll break it to you anyway: Believe me or not, but companies are set up to make money. That is why people open businesses. Therefore, stressing constantly that Microsoft is about $ is as original/funny/entertaining as stating that water is wet.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.