Solaris / OpenSolarisThis forum is for the discussion of Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, and illumos.
General Sun, SunOS and Sparc related questions also go here. Any Solaris fork or distribution is welcome.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The numbers don't agree. The next things that come to mind that might, possibly, help are, in Solaris 10:
1. vmstat lists the size of the free list in K
2. sar -r shows amount of free pages available
3. sar can be installed locally or globally (not sure, of the top of head about vmstat, but I believe it can also be tied to a zone)
Are you getting this information while logged into a local zone or the global zone (or are you using zones at all?)
Check the output of "prstat -m" or "prstat -a" and "prstat -z"
The only rationale that I can come up with (not "knowing" the answer yet) is that one of the numbers (vmstat possibly) is recording numbers globally and sar is recording locally within a zone.
Otherwise, it appears that you have 3gb of memory unaccounted for. The first (well, next) I would do, if I had the chance and none of the above applied, would be reboot the machine to make sure that vmstat isn't reporting incorrectly. My experience is that, once vmstat gets goofed (by wraparound or losing track during thrashing) it stays that way until its counters get cleared.
I'll stay on this list. I'm very interested to see how this turns out.
Thanks for posting the numbers, too. Definitely shows that there's a "major" difference that doesn't make sense assuming that all things are equal.
This machine is not using zones, and it's a Very Important Server I can't reboot at whim. However it has been rebooted since I started this thread and to my knowledge has never had its numbers agree.
I'll definitely check it out. Also, if it's not data that you can't share, can you post output of "uname -a" (solaris kernel/patch version) and, if possible, "prtdiag -v" (or just the model of your server, actual memory, etc from that output), "psrinfo" and "kstat."
Since this problem is so seemingly difficult it probably has a really easy explanation In any event, the more info you can share, the better. Obviously, if you'd be getting in trouble revealing any of that information, paraphrasing it would be better than nothing.
for some of the higher volume apps you're running? This should show you exact pagesize's per process. It seems like, from the simple admin-end, that it makes things a bit more difficult to eyeball, but it could be that only certain processes are using higher-than-default pagesize.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.