LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > Solaris / OpenSolaris
User Name
Password
Solaris / OpenSolaris This forum is for the discussion of Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, and illumos.
General Sun, SunOS and Sparc related questions also go here. Any Solaris fork or distribution is welcome.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-02-2006, 02:13 PM   #16
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 77

I have a card with the same chipset (realtek RTL-8139) and it works well with Solaris.
 
Old 12-02-2006, 03:13 PM   #17
as400
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Solaris 10 (x86) and Windows XP Pro SP2
Posts: 596

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I do not know whats the deal here...

Are you sure I put the "dns" in the right line??

I need this very urgently to be connected under Solaris...Any other suggestions please??

And here is my ifconfig -a output as well...

rtls0: inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2 inet
192.168.1.100 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether: MY MAC ADDRESS which I will not show here...

And also...everytime I boot Solaris...I noticed that it says things like this below:

NOTICE: rtls0: link down
NOTICE: rtls0: link up 100Mbps Full_Duplex as its booting.

Last edited by as400; 12-02-2006 at 03:40 PM.
 
Old 12-02-2006, 03:45 PM   #18
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by as400
I do not know whats the deal here...

Are you sure I put the "dns" in the right line??

I need this very urgently to be connected under Solaris...Any other suggestions please??
Yes the dns bit is in the right line. That line was plucked straight from my Solaris Express /etc/nsswitch.conf. I am using a static IP, so the other thing I did was put my nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf e.g.
Code:
nameserver SOMEIP
nameserver SOMEIP
 
Old 12-02-2006, 04:09 PM   #19
as400
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Solaris 10 (x86) and Windows XP Pro SP2
Posts: 596

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
OK..now heres what I DID NOT SEE in the installation part in the Wizard..Look below:
http://imgfly.com/files/021206_021343/

Normally I would of selected DHCP...And I also chose NETWORKED also before that page..


It did NOT ask me that during installation....I only saw an IP Address of 192.168.1.100 in the IP Address field...thats all and I clicked on next..next and next...thats it..

I am not using statics...Im using a PPPoE type connection

Last edited by as400; 12-02-2006 at 04:20 PM.
 
Old 12-02-2006, 04:33 PM   #20
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by as400
jlliagre,

I cannot access ANY webpage at all...
That wasn't my question. The page I suggest you to try doesn't requires DNS resolution and would help figuring out what's wrong with your settings.
Anyway, as you stubbornly refuse this first test, try this other one and tell us what it shows:

Code:
 /usr/sbin/arp  64.179.4.146
 
Old 12-02-2006, 04:43 PM   #21
as400
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Solaris 10 (x86) and Windows XP Pro SP2
Posts: 596

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I think I posted my results earlier..

And it said something like: CONNECTION WAS REFUSED..
 
Old 12-02-2006, 04:47 PM   #22
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by as400
I think I posted my results earlier..
You think wrong.
Quote:
And it said something like: CONNECTION WAS REFUSED..
To the arp command ??
 
Old 12-02-2006, 04:53 PM   #23
as400
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Solaris 10 (x86) and Windows XP Pro SP2
Posts: 596

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Sorry to keep you waiting but I have to boot in and out of both Windows and Solaris...

Ok...Here we go..

Code:
server2 (my hostname) sendmail: 312
UNABLE TO QUALIFY MY OWN DOMAIN NAME (SERVER2)-- USING SHORT NAME.
And when I installed Solaris..I ususally SHOULD OF gotten this screenshot to select if I am using DHCP or not..Which would of been YES...
http://imgfly.com/files/021206_021343/

Last edited by as400; 12-02-2006 at 04:55 PM.
 
Old 12-02-2006, 05:07 PM   #24
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
The lines you posted have nothing to do with your web access problem, you can simply ignore them for now.

Can you please answer the question I asked about the arp command output ?
 
Old 12-02-2006, 05:19 PM   #25
as400
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Solaris 10 (x86) and Windows XP Pro SP2
Posts: 596

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thats what it gave me when I entered this:
/usr/sbin/arp 64.179.4.146
 
Old 12-02-2006, 05:21 PM   #26
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Hmmm, try again.
 
Old 12-02-2006, 05:28 PM   #27
as400
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Solaris 10 (x86) and Windows XP Pro SP2
Posts: 596

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
OK..I did this...

arp server2 (my hostname)

server2 (192.168.1.100) at 0:d:87:2f:65:66 permanent published

Just tell me what would be the best fix for this please? I hate to reboot in and out of Solaris again just to access the net from Windows..

And how come it did not gave this screenshot http://imgfly.com/files/021206_021343/ during the installation?? It just only had this IP address like this: 192.168.1.100 already...It seemed that it already put that there by default or it had detected this IP address..

Last edited by as400; 12-02-2006 at 05:32 PM.
 
Old 12-02-2006, 05:47 PM   #28
as400
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Solaris 10 (x86) and Windows XP Pro SP2
Posts: 596

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I try it again and it gave this:

(64.179.4.146) -- no entry

And what would you say or tell me about this here? This is from ifconfig -a

rtls0: inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2 inet
192.168.1.100 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether: MY MAC ADDRESS which I will not show here...

Last edited by as400; 12-02-2006 at 05:54 PM.
 
Old 12-02-2006, 06:17 PM   #29
as400
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Solaris 10 (x86) and Windows XP Pro SP2
Posts: 596

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Fixed it!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOSH........

I have to have a smoke NOW!!!!

This is how....

Code:
echo "nameserver 192.168.1.1" > /etc/resolv.conf
And I'll bet so do you...

I should still thank you for helping me....Thanks!!!!

But I should still ask WHY and what the HECK was the issue here...Care t explain??

Last edited by as400; 12-02-2006 at 06:31 PM.
 
Old 12-03-2006, 03:43 AM   #30
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by as400
Fixed it!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOSH........

I have to have a smoke NOW!!!!

This is how....

Code:
echo "nameserver 192.168.1.1" > /etc/resolv.conf
I was suspecting that.
Quote:
And I'll bet so do you...

I should still thank you for helping me....Thanks!!!!
You're welcome, but it could have been faster should you have really tested what I asked for.
As fixing the resolv.conf file was enough, you simply lied when telling the plain IP URL was unresponsive
Quote:
But I should still ask WHY and what the HECK was the issue here...Care t explain??
Bad luck ?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Outdoor WiFi router runs x86 Debian Linux LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-09-2006 05:01 PM
Boot x86 target from flash, with the image and file system on the x86 host. batsayan Linux - Software 2 08-23-2005 12:09 AM
SuSE X86 problems drcyber Linux - Newbie 3 08-30-2004 05:54 PM
Soalris 9 installation Woes satchm0h Solaris / OpenSolaris 7 10-23-2003 02:56 PM
RedHat 9 on Soalris ??? nuwanguy Solaris / OpenSolaris 5 09-17-2003 10:07 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > Solaris / OpenSolaris

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration