Solaris / OpenSolarisThis forum is for the discussion of Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, and illumos.
General Sun, SunOS and Sparc related questions also go here. Any Solaris fork or distribution is welcome.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have a couple of server that I want to play around with and my question is what flavor of OpenSolaris would you recommend? Nexenta, schilliX,MartUX,Belenix,Solaris Express,OpenSolaris Development Preview. ?
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789
Rep:
Solaris Express is the most up to date distribution. Perhaps Indiana (OpenSolaris development preview) will became the "reference implementation" in the future.
Far be it for me to argue with jlliagre re Solaris. But ...
I had Solaris 10 in for a while - went to get some updates and I had to register. That gets up my nose. Same applies to Express. I will download the preview tonight and see if I like OpenSolaris - been thinking about it for a while. Used to be issues with grub - I'll see what falls apart on my test box.
I'm really more interested to see how the Solaris on zSeries port will develop, but might as well see what OpenSolaris looks like.
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by syg00
I had Solaris 10 in for a while - went to get some updates and I had to register. That gets up my nose.
Get up your nose ? I'm learning English expressions on this forum but after all that's why I registered on LQ in the first time: to practice that funny/bizarre language that dominates the world.
Well, back to the point: What's wrong with registering ? You only need to do it once and as far as I know, security patches and Solaris 10 new releases are both free
Quote:
Same applies to Express.
There are no patches to SX, you just update or install the latest version and you are done.
Quote:
Used to be issues with grub - I'll see what falls apart on my test box.
I don't think there are changes yet with GRUB on Indiana. What were the issues you had with it ?
Quote:
I'm really more interested to see how the Solaris on zSeries port will develop
I don't think there are changes yet with GRUB on Indiana. What were the issues you had with it ?
I seem to recall Sun insisting on you using their loader (prior to 10 maybe ...) I got Solaris 10 to chainload o.k. from my Linux system, but I deliberately built it first to ensure it didn't screw up my other systems. We will see what transpires with the so-called open system grub shipped with OpenSolaris.
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by syg00
It goes against my view of FOSS.
I suspect there are legal or financial reasons behind that registration requirement. Solaris Express is not FOSS but built by Sun Microsystems from FOSS. It is more or less a beta release of the next commercial Solaris release. The fact Solaris is free (as in free beer) doesn't change that.
OTOH, Indiana, Belenix, Nexenta, marTux and Shillix are built by the community or individuals from the same FOSS so aren't bound to by these constraints.
Quote:
I seem to recall Sun insisting on you using their loader (prior to 10 maybe ...)
Yes, until Solaris 10 update 1, a proprietary boot loader was used on x86 h/w.
Quote:
We will see what transpires with the so-called open system grub shipped with OpenSolaris.
I have no problem booting Linux with it. The only issue is you have to manually copy the Linux entries in Solaris menu.lst. Not that difficult.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.