LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > slarm64
User Name
Password
slarm64 This forum is for the discussion of slarm64.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-25-2021, 12:58 AM   #1
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,915

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Pale Moon (slarm64 , aarch64)


Pale Moon update 29.4.0.2
palemoon-29.4.0.2-aarch64-1mara.txz
 
Old 01-06-2022, 06:29 AM   #2
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,359

Rep: Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335
I have a few issues with palemoon here.
  • Palemoon is slightly faster than FF on x86_64, but noticably slower on the RazPi.
  • Palemoon goes out to lunch on some sites. It timed out on https://www.jw.org/en/library/videos/#en/home, while it loads in under 5 seconds on x86_64
Both FF and Palemoon on Slarm64 go out to lunch streaming videos. The biggest resolution from jw.org is 720p and I'm talking about 1 hdmi screen @60 hz. The screen fades to black, with the sound continuing sometimes for a bit. If I press a key, it returns, and all is well for another 3-5 minutes. If I do nothing, it returns when it feels like it and I've missed a chunk of what I was watching. Shrinking the video frame does help. Identical behaviour on both FF & palemoon - video memory? VLC has no difficulties. Bandwidth here is 2-3MB/s, more than enough. It's reliable too. I'm on a feed off a nearby glass fibre trunk.

I'll grab chromium next time and try that, as it has the chrome engine.

EDIT: On the site above, Chrome takes about 7 seconds. FF does it in about 10 seconds, IIRC.

Last edited by business_kid; 01-06-2022 at 11:05 AM.
 
Old 09-17-2022, 05:48 PM   #3
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,915

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
palemoon-31.2.0-aarch64-1mara.txz
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-18-2022, 10:16 AM   #4
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,359

Rep: Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335
Thanks, but that's compiled against glibc-2.34, which I presume is ~current. I'm on 15.0 which has glibc-2.33. Do you have the source online? I know palemoon.org does, but I presume there's a patch or three required for Aarch64.
 
Old 09-18-2022, 10:49 AM   #5
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,915

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
yes, collected for current. build script.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-24-2023, 10:48 AM   #6
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,359

Rep: Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335
Updated to palemoon-32.2.0, which they are claiming great things for (as usual). I used the GTK-2.x, and the changelog included this line
Code:
Fixed a build issue when building for Linux on ARM64 on later distros.
 
Old 05-24-2023, 09:41 PM   #7
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,915

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
palemoon-32.1.0-aarch64-1mara.txz
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-20-2023, 08:32 AM   #8
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,359

Rep: Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335
I tried to get this last evening and the download kept failing at about 37 megs. Is the link good?
 
Old 08-20-2023, 09:46 AM   #9
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,915

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
I tried to get this last evening and the download kept failing at about 37 megs. Is the link good?
yes, mirror
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-20-2023, 12:56 PM   #10
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,359

Rep: Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335
Hmmph! That's giving me a 502 - bad gateway. I'll keep trying.

EDIT: I got palemoon from slarm64.org. I couldn't establish an SSL connection with wget. I tried without the 's' in https://, but that returned the same error . There must be strange things happening with my connection, or the ether at large. It used always be the case in very wet weather, but the pervasiveness of glass optical fibre here seems to have reduced that.

Last edited by business_kid; 08-20-2023 at 01:35 PM.
 
Old 08-20-2023, 02:13 PM   #11
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,359

Rep: Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335
I have Palemoon installed but it pukes with screenfuls of this
Code:
(pale moon:3776): Gtk-WARNING **: 18:58:33.187: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "murrine",

(pale moon:3776): Gtk-WARNING **: 18:58:33.188: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "murrine",
Then it dies with the error
Code:
! Your Pale Moon profile cannot be loaded or it may be inaccessible
The exclamation mark is an icon, it's big.

Personally I don't believe it. It doesn't have my profile first time out anyhow. When I saw that, I deleted anything palemoon ~/.local/share & ~/.cache but I kept the ~/.config stuff.
 
Old 08-23-2023, 03:18 PM   #12
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,915

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
palemoon-32.3.0-aarch64-1mara.txz
 
Old 08-24-2023, 06:46 AM   #13
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,359

Rep: Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
I tried to get this last evening and the download kept failing at about 37 megs. Is the link good?
I got to the bottom of the download thing today. It's failing with Chromium-based browsers. But it's working fine on Palemoon, (and other FF based ones, I presume). It's saying
Code:
This file can't be downloaded securely.
If I try to open it in a separate tab, the tab half opens and aborts. md5sum of the download is 70d567e4de01517b413f3da7b1dad426. I found a copy of it around, and the md5sum is the same. So it's a good download, only Chromium doesn't know it.

As for PM-32.3.0 that throws the same error exactly and doesn't run.
Code:
! Your Pale Moon profile cannot be loaded or it may be inaccessible
I've a very similar setup on x86_64 here. Slackware64-15.0 on XFCE, and my RazPi mainly runs browsers, vlc, rsync & ssh. I've no theme errors (despite not having 'murrine' installed).
 
Old 09-02-2023, 02:04 PM   #14
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,359

Rep: Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335Reputation: 2335
Well, I have Palemoon-32.3.0 working!

My SSD has the RazPi-4 image (kernel-6.4.8). At the same time I mirrored the slarm64-current and ran upgradepkg on the relevant directories. But the kernel there was 6.1.27

I burned another sdcard with the image, enlarged the sdcard's ext4 partition, and copied the palemoon package into /home. I then booted on that, installed palemoon, and palemoon worked. I'm back on my ssd, now. But it seems something is off on my SSD install. Either Current had different versions up, or else it's because I lacked a clean install. I hate installation gremlins.

So my next move unless you advise otherwise is to boot from the SSD, and run 'rsync -avc' to transfer everything relevant from the sdcard / to the SSD /. That will be a slow process so I'll start it tomorrow morning and let it have the day at it. It's not a fast sdcard, but who cares? I'll transfer the $PATH & LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and everything in /etc/X11 and /usr/X11R6. I will go to lengths to avoid upsetting all the careful configuration in /etc, largely because I've forgotten what I did. I have it backed up, but I have forgotten.
 
Old 09-02-2023, 04:53 PM   #15
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,915

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
So my next move unless you advise otherwise is to boot from the SSD, and run 'rsync -avc' to transfer everything relevant from the sdcard / to the SSD /. That will be a slow process so I'll start it tomorrow morning and let it have the day at it. It's not a fast sdcard, but who cares? I'll transfer the $PATH & LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and everything in /etc/X11 and /usr/X11R6. I will go to lengths to avoid upsetting all the careful configuration in /etc, largely because I've forgotten what I did. I have it backed up, but I have forgotten.
you can check dependencies
Code:
ldd /usr/lib64/palemoon-32.3.0/libxul.so
or compare installed packages on two systems
 
  


Reply

Tags
aarch64, slackware, slarm64



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Want Firefox without Australis? Try Pale Moon LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-01-2014 08:51 PM
Pale Moon - A firefox fork coralfang Linux - Software 9 07-16-2014 01:52 PM
Pale Moon Browser TigerLinux General 10 12-28-2011 10:59 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > slarm64

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration