[SOLVED] libseccomp.so.2 missing from rootfs

jloco · 08-22-2023, 01:19 AM

Not sure if you're aware but the latest rootfs I have is dated Aug-08 and libseccomp is required for nano I believe since v7.0. Without it nano fails to launch.

Users with no internet trying to bootstrap a new install would need to use 'vi' *shudder*

glorsplitz · 08-22-2023, 04:19 PM

following up

FILELIST.TXT says

Quote:

Fri Aug 11 14:34:29 BST 2023

Here is the file list for this directory. If you are using a
mirror site and find missing or extra files in the disk
subdirectories, please have the archive administrator refresh
the mirror.
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 593 2022-04-26 00:48 ./slackware/l/libseccomp-2.5.4-aarch64-1.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 89784 2022-04-26 00:48 ./slackware/l/libseccomp-2.5.4-aarch64-1.txz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 455 2022-04-26 00:48 ./slackware/l/libseccomp-2.5.4-aarch64-1.txz.asc

and I see the following in one my installs

Quote:

ls -al /usr/lib64/libseccomp*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Apr 29 2022 /usr/lib64/libseccomp.so -> libseccomp.so.2.5.4*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Apr 29 2022 /usr/lib64/libseccomp.so.2 -> libseccomp.so.2.5.4*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 120976 Apr 25 2022 /usr/lib64/libseccomp.so.2.5.4*

so maybe a ball got dropped somewheres? and 'refresh the mirror'?

jloco · 08-22-2023, 06:25 PM

If it’s in the latest then disregard. But the latest my rsync has pulled is dated 8/08 therefor since it’s been at least 6 months now, I should mention it. If there’s a new refresh and it's included then by all means ignore this message.

jloco · 08-23-2023, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glorsplitz

following up

FILELIST.TXT says

and I see the following in one my installs

so maybe a ball got dropped somewheres? and 'refresh the mirror'?

Following up with my last comment as I've had time to look and verify I'm using the latest rootfs. Mind you I'm not speaking of the full distribution, it's of course included there. This is the rootfs used to bootstrap new installs, or systems, not officially supported, available here: http://slackware.uk/slackwarearm/sla...08Aug23.tar.xz. The list of packages included is missing the libseccomp library which renders nano broken on the rootfs.

drmozes · 08-24-2023, 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jloco

Not sure if you're aware but the latest rootfs I have is dated Aug-08 and libseccomp is required for nano I believe since v7.0. Without it nano fails to launch.

Users with no internet trying to bootstrap a new install would need to use 'vi' *shudder*

Thanks, it'll be fixed in the next batch which will proably be pushed early next week.