SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi I am wondering which is best(big error to past a question, I know I know) there are a few areas that I am wondering about but the most important are:
(1)Boot Time
(2)Software support i.e the package manager
(3)ease of install
(4)hardware support, wireless cards, USB devices etc
I have noticed that Slackware seems to be more popular so it probably would be easier to get help on, but I read some ware that Puppy Linux has a 30 second boot time which is awesome. Any thoughts or suggestions on a fast booting distro?
I will be honest with you Slackware is great, it really is!
(1)Boot Time
Well by default Slackware's boot time is okay, but if you modify the scripts a little its FAST! I mean 12-15 sec boot time if you know what you are doing.
(2)Software support i.e the package manager
pkgtool is a very good software management system, it doesn't track dependentcys, but it lets you do what you want without nagging at you, or screwing something up is you install the package correctly.
(3)ease of install
Slackware is very simple to install and configure, it lets you do what you want to it without crying or not listening to your commands.
(4)hardware support, wireless cards, USB devices etc
Slackware out of the box, supports a wide range of hardware, even some wireless cards, but I will tell you know you will have to get your hands dirty (most slackers prefer this), every USB device I have used has worked under slackware, everything from keyboard and mice to media card readers to webcams. Some hardware slackware doesn't setup for you, so like I said before you will most likly need to do some work.
Their is a patch floating around that will make the nessary changes, it can be adapted to make what it boots more useful, it also depends on what options you have enabled in the kernel and what hardware you have, there is no "udev" support, it is achieved by using static device nodes and running some scripts in parelle, when you get a bash prompt slackware is not actually done loading it just continues loading into the background, this can break somethings like NFS or samba or anything executed by rc.local because it runs very last.
EDIT: BootFast, you only need 2 CD really, the first and second cds are the install, the 3rd cd is international support and cds 4,5,6 are the slackware books and the sourcecode.
Last edited by z3r0.0v3rrid3; 01-06-2007 at 02:14 AM.
Hi z3r0.0v3rrid3,
12-15 sec. is really fast. Can you share with us what are the scripts that are to be modified and how?
Most of the modding you can do is within the rc.M script (/etc/rc.d/rc.M). I usually comment out ldconfig and fc-cache and run them manually when required. Also you can comment out nearly everyhing you don't need, just be sure you know what you're doing . Also (i use a laptop) you can edit rc.pcmcia if you know what module your pcmcia card requires and comment out the ones that you don't use. In the end, you can add on top of lilo.conf (/etc/lilo.conf) file option "compact", which gives you a faster boot. Just my 2c.
You really only need CD #1, and possibly #2 if you want to use the 2.6 kernel modules (often this means ethernet card support)
Yep, you do need CD #2 if you want the 2.6.17.13 kernel modules. And you need CD #4 if you want the 2.6.18 kernel modules. If you're going to install a 2.6.xx kernel you will need to mount the CD and install the kernel modules and headers.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.