LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-17-2015, 06:34 PM   #1
mralk3
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: May 2015
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,904

Rep: Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053
lxc-start since last upgrade in -current, reproducible error


This error is not keeping me from using LXC in any way. Everything seems to operate as usual. I am using a network bridge with wifi. It is set up using proxy_arp =1 and ip_forward = 1. All of my containers are running either Slackware{,64} or Slackware{,64}-current. I did google this but I found next to no information with various queries. Whether it is a bug or a misconfiguration, I thought should ask about it here.

What exactly does this output mean?

Code:
# lxc-stop -k -n slackrepo ; lxc-start -n slackrepo 
lxc-start: utils.c: setproctitle: 1461 Invalid argument - setting cmdline failed
/var/log/lxc/slackrepo.log
Code:
lxc-start 1447805972.561 ERROR    lxc_utils - utils.c:setproctitle:1461 - Invalid argument - setting cmdline failed
lxc-start 1447806400.206 ERROR    lxc_utils - utils.c:setproctitle:1461 - Invalid argument - setting cmdline failed
 
Old 11-17-2015, 06:56 PM   #2
mancha
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 484

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
LXC is complaining that it's unable to make certain prctl calls. The operative effect seems to be that LXC is unable to set the process titles. How serious is this? I'd have to review LXC code more closely but at first glance doesn't seem too worrisome.

In order to enable these prctl calls you should ask Pat to set CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE in Slackware-current kernels (see: commit).

--mancha

Last edited by mancha; 11-17-2015 at 06:58 PM.
 
Old 11-17-2015, 07:01 PM   #3
chris.willing
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2014
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Slackware,LFS
Posts: 917

Rep: Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619Reputation: 619
See:
https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pi...er/010409.html
 
Old 11-17-2015, 07:04 PM   #4
mralk3
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: May 2015
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,904

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053Reputation: 1053
Thanks for the quick responses. I thought it was harmless, this just confirms it.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Network help with unprivileged lxc containers on -current Rinndalir Slackware 6 09-10-2015 11:59 AM
script to get a lxc-container like iso of current. cod_liver_0il Slackware 1 09-10-2012 11:12 AM
[SOLVED] Slackware64-Current Bug in lxc 0.7.5 Jack128 Slackware 7 08-25-2012 12:53 PM
[SOLVED] X Fails To Start After Upgrade to Slackware64-current hkothari Slackware 7 03-06-2010 09:40 PM
*Nearly* Successful Upgrade to Current - Could Not Start D-Bus- No X BobNutfield Slackware 6 06-05-2009 12:04 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration