LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Puppy
User Name
Password
Puppy This forum is for the discussion of Puppy Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-01-2009, 07:03 AM   #1
pierre2
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Perth, AU
Distribution: LinuxMint
Posts: 388
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 88
Smile Which version?.


So, which version of Puppy do you think is the best?.
( & why ).
 
Old 05-02-2009, 03:56 AM   #2
repo
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 8,529

Rep: Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899
The latest release.
 
Old 05-02-2009, 03:29 PM   #3
computerophil
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Location: Austria
Distribution: Various: Puppy, Knoppix, Openmamba, Mandriva,......
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: 18
It depends what for?
I liked very much 1.08, 2.12 and I think 4.x are great
4.2 is a good distribution but the clock is disturbing me I don't like the vista type shnickshnack.
Puppy used to be small and never the less it did every thing fine. The programselection is perfect.
The wizards are well chosen so that there is excellent hardwarededection
even the installation-wizard is perfect. I tested about 60 distributions but Puppy is unic with this perfect but simple installation-wizard.

What I like very much with Slax is the possibility of adding programs via a script directly into the iso for downloading. That would be a great idea also for Puppy.

I really lack good translations into german, italian and spanish.

But a Puppy is a must with every installation I do (it helps me so much also in making the service to other operating systems)
 
Old 06-10-2009, 05:34 PM   #4
bigearsbilly
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: england
Distribution: Mint, Armbian, NetBSD, Puppy, Raspbian
Posts: 3,515

Rep: Reputation: 239Reputation: 239Reputation: 239
I don't like the latest version.
it's losing it's edge and getting bloated like knoppix.

i don't like the way it reads the CD all the time and you cannot eject the CD anymore like in 4.1 and below.
 
Old 06-10-2009, 08:45 PM   #5
DragonSlayer48DX
Registered User
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,454
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigearsbilly View Post
I don't like the latest version.
it's losing it's edge and getting bloated like knoppix.

i don't like the way it reads the CD all the time and you cannot eject the CD anymore like in 4.1 and below.
Really? Are you not saving the pup_420.sfs and pup_save.2fs files? You only need to do that once, then Puppy loads much faster and you can use the drive after it's booted.
 
Old 06-10-2009, 11:19 PM   #6
computerophil
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Location: Austria
Distribution: Various: Puppy, Knoppix, Openmamba, Mandriva,......
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigearsbilly View Post
I don't like the latest version.
it's losing it's edge and getting bloated like knoppix.

i don't like the way it reads the CD all the time and you cannot eject the CD anymore like in 4.1 and below.
I also prefer the previous Puppies. I think there comes more and more not necessary things with it (irritating eyecandy). But Puppy is still far away from beeing bloated.
Also Knoppix is a very good distro, with good hardware detection and beginnerfriendly.

I think I understood what you wanted to say but the example was chosen badly.
 
Old 06-11-2009, 04:16 PM   #7
bigearsbilly
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: england
Distribution: Mint, Armbian, NetBSD, Puppy, Raspbian
Posts: 3,515

Rep: Reputation: 239Reputation: 239Reputation: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonslayer48dx View Post
Really? Are you not saving the pup_420.sfs and pup_save.2fs files? You only need to do that once, then Puppy loads much faster and you can use the drive after it's booted.
Hmm
well I have used puppy for years and just went from 4.1 to 4.2
it migrated my pup_save files
as it usually does.
and noticed I couldn't eject the CD.
it's never happened in the past when i upgraded.

I will try again.

Last edited by bigearsbilly; 06-11-2009 at 04:18 PM.
 
Old 06-11-2009, 05:28 PM   #8
bigearsbilly
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: england
Distribution: Mint, Armbian, NetBSD, Puppy, Raspbian
Posts: 3,515

Rep: Reputation: 239Reputation: 239Reputation: 239
well, i worked it out.
when you upgrade an old puppy save file it doesn't
copy the pup420.sfs on to the partition.
so you have to start in ram mode, make a new pup save
then it copies the 4.2 sfs.

subsequently you can go back to the previous pup save.

I take it all back.
puppy is still indispensable.
 
Old 06-11-2009, 07:10 PM   #9
DragonSlayer48DX
Registered User
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,454
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigearsbilly View Post
well, i worked it out.
when you upgrade an old puppy save file it doesn't
copy the pup420.sfs on to the partition.
so you have to start in ram mode, make a new pup save
then it copies the 4.2 sfs.

subsequently you can go back to the previous pup save.

I take it all back.
puppy is still indispensable.
Excellent news.

Alternatively, (and for future upgrades) all you need to do is manually copy the .sfs file from the CD to the HDD partition, then reboot the CD.

Cheers
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Regarding distribution + kernel version + gcc version + glib version. JCipriani Linux - General 8 04-19-2008 02:54 PM
redhat fedora gcc version (compiled for 2.4.20) doesn't match kernel version 2.4.22 start1000 Linux - Software 0 03-16-2004 08:17 PM
Xfree Error (EE) module ABI minor version (7) is newer than the server's version (6) jimdaworm Slackware 0 10-17-2003 05:26 PM
Xfree prob radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but version 1.5.0 or newer needed. jimdaworm Slackware 0 10-01-2003 06:27 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Puppy

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration