ProgrammingThis forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
yeah Pixel you should checkout the original posting date. someone rezzed this one when I said it was an old post a two years ago :P its officially a zombie
Hi
Does that tell you the actual speed the chip is running at when it's under clocked ?
The reason I want to know is because my link station live (NAS) runs slower than the pro version but the hardware is the same.
I just want to know if it's under clocked. If not then I think it can only be firmware or perhaps some other hardware bottleneck.
Sorry for the resurrection. I don't expect any replies. But I wanted to thank everyone for a very interesting thread as well as the useful info. I'm still some what new to Linux. Not to computers, or command line. Just to Linux. Which I LOVE. And this thread was amusing. Someone was thoughtful enough to remind everyone to backup before taking advice. Brilliant! No one wants to admit it but yes, even the most intelligent has forgotten once or twice and kicked him/herself!
I found the uname command useful because I really wasn't sure how many bits my processor was. I can't believe I forgot. You think you'll remember these things but I don't know how many computer parts I have laying around here and which ones I'm actually using any more. lol
But I did find [/proc/cpuinfo] useful too. Now I am sure which processor it is as well. Or at least more sure. Narrows it down anyway.
So thank you all so very much for re-resurrecting this zombie and letting me find this thread!!! I cannot contribute but I sure do appreciate it!! I hope it's here later in case I forget or lose my notes.
Initially some users in this post wanted a way in linux to get get the CPU ID.
After many years I notice that no one replied.
So is there any mean in linux to get the CPU ID?
I mean, for example there are several Intel pentium 4 models, all identified by a unique number e.g. 620, 630, 631, 640, 641, 650, 651, 660.
If one tries cpuz in windows he will get this info straight forward whereas /proc/cpuinfo in linux does not contain it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.