LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Mandriva
User Name
Password
Mandriva This Forum is for the discussion of Mandriva (Mandrake) Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2005, 06:14 AM   #16
opjose
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Outlying D.C.
Distribution: Mandriva
Posts: 2,090

Rep: Reputation: 46

Quote:
Originally posted by xxx_koony_xxx
OK I am just starting to break the bands of Microsoft. I also have this Kernel Panic error. What do you mean by try a new Kernel? Is it try a nother OS? I have loaded Mandrake 10.1 off of these CD's succefully twice, but for some reason this old Gateway box (this is probly why it will not work) will not load it.
That is correct.

In effect the kernel is complaining that the motherboard is not handling the interrupts correctly.

This falls outside they pervue of the kernel itself.

The motherboard is doing something it shouldn't causing the kernel to panic.

Causes can range from spurious interrupts, shorted lines, conflicts, a bad or damaged chipset, bad ram, etc. or even just an old "brain dead" chipset...

That is one with a bug in it which the kernel cannot simply ignore.
 
Old 01-31-2005, 04:28 PM   #17
Jagro
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
I had exactly the same error, only not after installing but at the first attempt to install Fedora Core 3 on an old system.
It hung on mounting /dev/hdc, the Cdrom device.
I found a suggestion to replace the Cdrom, tried it and it worked. So, it may be worth while trying to interpret the error messages before the final panic report. It may be the Cdrom, but could also be another hardware device that has a conflicting IRQ.
 
Old 03-03-2005, 09:11 AM   #18
iarwain
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hi,

I've solved it disabling "CFQ I/O Scheduler" in the kernel. There's a thread about this in the Gentoo forums. I hope it's helpful.
 
Old 03-20-2005, 12:57 PM   #19
kailun
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 48

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by iarwain
Hi,

I've solved it disabling "CFQ I/O Scheduler" in the kernel. There's a thread about this in the Gentoo forums. I hope it's helpful.
Hi, how did you disable this?

I currently only have remote access to the machine, what would be the best way of disabling "CFQ I/O Scheduler" in the kernel?

Thanks
 
Old 03-20-2005, 01:38 PM   #20
opjose
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Outlying D.C.
Distribution: Mandriva
Posts: 2,090

Rep: Reputation: 46
While the CFK patches are interesting, they are basically an attempt to disable the normal scheduled queuing of I/O.

One thing is to try to tweak things for performance, another is to disable it altogether.

This is not really a solution.

In effect the OP's system has a problem that must be addressed.

Switching cards around is a good start.

If you followed some of the threads indicated you would have seen people both complaining and talking about the CMOS/BIOS IRQ assignments...

What they failed to understand is that while most bioses permit you to select WHICH IRQ is to be assigned, they bios does not give you direct control over which devices share the IRQ lines.

This (usually) is done in hardware.

On most systems 2, 3, or more devices are "tied together" in hardware (with some exceptions particularly server systems which have far more IRQ's available via backplanes, etc...).

Thus when you change an IRQ for one of these devices, you'll find that all 2, 3 or more will end up with the same IRQ no matter what you do.

Now couple the bonding with devices that generate a lot of NMI's at high rates like video cards, drive controllers and LAN interfaces and you have a problem which the kernel cannot cope with.

It's equally problematic for Windows too.

No, the problem needs to be solved at the hardware level.

One trick is to shove things around so that IRQ's are only shared by devices which usually are not active simultaneously...

e.g. your modem and LAN card, etc.


Gawd... after all these years I can't believe that resource battles still rear their ugly heads.

These problems should have gone the way of the Do-Do ages ago.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kernal panic Fatal exception in interrupt gilman824 Linux - Newbie 2 07-19-2005 12:37 PM
Kernel Panic Exception Interrupt eloialsina Linux - Laptop and Netbook 1 04-26-2005 10:10 PM
kernel panic: fatal exception w/ equinox gregew Linux - Hardware 1 10-08-2004 07:28 PM
FC2 Kernel Panic fatal exception in interrupt beardflute Fedora 6 09-11-2004 12:10 PM
Kernel panic: Fatal exception in interrupt dickmobbis Fedora 0 07-15-2004 12:16 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Mandriva

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration