LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-03-2016, 06:45 PM   #106
NGIB
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Sumter SC, USA
Distribution: MX, Lubuntu
Posts: 449

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Sadly, LQ is becoming unusable for hours every day. It just started again...
 
Old 02-03-2016, 06:47 PM   #107
timl
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Fedora,CentOS
Posts: 751

Rep: Reputation: 156Reputation: 156
I tend to simply ignore the forums which are being spammed
 
Old 02-03-2016, 06:51 PM   #108
NGIB
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Sumter SC, USA
Distribution: MX, Lubuntu
Posts: 449

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by timl View Post
I tend to simply ignore the forums which are being spammed
I use the "new posts" which is rendered useless...
 
Old 02-03-2016, 06:53 PM   #109
astrogeek
Moderator
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware [64]-X.{0|1|2|37|-current} ::12<=X<=15, FreeBSD_12{.0|.1}
Posts: 6,269
Blog Entries: 24

Rep: Reputation: 4206Reputation: 4206Reputation: 4206Reputation: 4206Reputation: 4206Reputation: 4206Reputation: 4206Reputation: 4206Reputation: 4206Reputation: 4206Reputation: 4206
Quote:
Originally Posted by timl View Post
I tend to simply ignore the forums which are being spammed
There is little else you can do, but it means that the zero reply and LQ SPy/New Posts threads become unusable too - and that means that legitimate new member posts are not easily monitored and may go unanswered for hours.

Last edited by astrogeek; 02-03-2016 at 06:55 PM.
 
Old 02-03-2016, 09:14 PM   #110
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,360
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6148Reputation: 6148Reputation: 6148Reputation: 6148Reputation: 6148Reputation: 6148Reputation: 6148Reputation: 6148Reputation: 6148Reputation: 6148Reputation: 6148
I usually start my LQ sessions by browsing the zero-reply search. It seemed to me that a lot fewer spams got through this time than last time, which, if I recall correctly, was several days ago.

I clicked to report the spams I saw and then went on about my business.

In my observation, this has not been an everyday thing and I think that, as LQ users, the best thing we can do is report the spams we see when we see them, allow the mods to do their thing, and not get all panicky.

This too shall pass.

Just my two cents.

Last edited by frankbell; 02-03-2016 at 09:16 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-04-2016, 05:54 AM   #111
wpeckham
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Continental USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat, DSL, Puppy, CentOS, Knoppix, Mint-DE, Sparky, VSIDO, tinycore, Q4OS, Manjaro
Posts: 5,707

Rep: Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720
LQ is never alone.

Give us a 'heads-up' if we can help.
 
Old 02-04-2016, 12:34 PM   #112
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,883
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4931Reputation: 4931Reputation: 4931Reputation: 4931Reputation: 4931Reputation: 4931Reputation: 4931Reputation: 4931Reputation: 4931Reputation: 4931Reputation: 4931
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
I usually start my LQ sessions by browsing the zero-reply search. It seemed to me that a lot fewer spams got through this time than last time, which, if I recall correctly, was several days ago.

I clicked to report the spams I saw and then went on about my business.

In my observation, this has not been an everyday thing and I think that, as LQ users, the best thing we can do is report the spams we see when we see them, allow the mods to do their thing, and not get all panicky.

This too shall pass.

Just my two cents.
I half think that reporting may be redundant, in that someone likely already may have. But there really isn't a way to tell about that. How do the reports gets to the mods? An email per report, or do they show up on a list they can view and redundancy is merely a statistic there?

I agree with reporting those threads in any case.
 
Old 02-04-2016, 12:35 PM   #113
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604

Rep: Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094
Multiple reports for the same post get grouped together automatically.

--jeremy
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-04-2016, 04:39 PM   #114
Keith Hedger
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2010
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Distribution: Void, Linux From Scratch, Slackware64
Posts: 3,154

Rep: Reputation: 857Reputation: 857Reputation: 857Reputation: 857Reputation: 857Reputation: 857Reputation: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy View Post
Multiple reports for the same post get grouped together automatically.

--jeremy
That's good to know as I'm never too sure whether reporting a spam post is just adding extra spam.
 
Old 10-05-2016, 02:48 AM   #115
pan64
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 21,976

Rep: Reputation: 7337Reputation: 7337Reputation: 7337Reputation: 7337Reputation: 7337Reputation: 7337Reputation: 7337Reputation: 7337Reputation: 7337Reputation: 7337Reputation: 7337
Looks like we have no spams at all. It is really good.
I have only one question now: is this the engine of LQ or something else? Can we have some info on it?
 
Old 10-05-2016, 05:52 AM   #116
wpeckham
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Continental USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat, DSL, Puppy, CentOS, Knoppix, Mint-DE, Sparky, VSIDO, tinycore, Q4OS, Manjaro
Posts: 5,707

Rep: Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720Reputation: 2720
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan64 View Post
Looks like we have no spams at all. It is really good.
I have only one question now: is this the engine of LQ or something else? Can we have some info on it?
I would like to see that ONLY if we can avoid having the specific steps made clear to the spammers. They would only use the information to try to bypass the protections. Again. We do not want that.
 
Old 10-05-2016, 09:38 AM   #117
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604

Rep: Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094Reputation: 4094
I've covered some of what we do to fight spam in the past, here: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...3/#post4606017

--jeremy
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Auto deleting spam assasins spam box via cronjob and Roundcube Junk Folder osmy Linux - Newbie 8 01-23-2012 04:22 PM
Move SA Marked Spam to Junk/Spam Folder Using Procmail, Postfix, and Virtual Users alden_pease Linux - Server 0 01-05-2012 12:29 AM
some threads are become unnoticed because of large number of continious threads deepak_cucek LQ Suggestions & Feedback 9 08-20-2009 11:21 PM
spam filter that puts spam into spam folder? paul_mat Linux - Software 3 03-31-2009 04:18 AM
Java threads listed using kill -3 does not contain all threads found using ps -auxww coneheed Programming 2 11-14-2005 08:57 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration