LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I tend to simply ignore the forums which are being spammed
There is little else you can do, but it means that the zero reply and LQ SPy/New Posts threads become unusable too - and that means that legitimate new member posts are not easily monitored and may go unanswered for hours.
I usually start my LQ sessions by browsing the zero-reply search. It seemed to me that a lot fewer spams got through this time than last time, which, if I recall correctly, was several days ago.
I clicked to report the spams I saw and then went on about my business.
In my observation, this has not been an everyday thing and I think that, as LQ users, the best thing we can do is report the spams we see when we see them, allow the mods to do their thing, and not get all panicky.
I usually start my LQ sessions by browsing the zero-reply search. It seemed to me that a lot fewer spams got through this time than last time, which, if I recall correctly, was several days ago.
I clicked to report the spams I saw and then went on about my business.
In my observation, this has not been an everyday thing and I think that, as LQ users, the best thing we can do is report the spams we see when we see them, allow the mods to do their thing, and not get all panicky.
This too shall pass.
Just my two cents.
I half think that reporting may be redundant, in that someone likely already may have. But there really isn't a way to tell about that. How do the reports gets to the mods? An email per report, or do they show up on a list they can view and redundancy is merely a statistic there?
Looks like we have no spams at all. It is really good.
I have only one question now: is this the engine of LQ or something else? Can we have some info on it?
Looks like we have no spams at all. It is really good.
I have only one question now: is this the engine of LQ or something else? Can we have some info on it?
I would like to see that ONLY if we can avoid having the specific steps made clear to the spammers. They would only use the information to try to bypass the protections. Again. We do not want that.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.