LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Do we actually have legitimate users who fill out the "Occupation" and "Interests" fields in their profiles? It seems to me like most spambots fill out those two fields and most legitimate users don't. The "Interests" field in particular.
Do we actually have legitimate users who fill out the "Occupation" and "Interests" fields in their profiles?
Yes.
Quote:
Do we need those fields?
No.
However, they are part of most fora. Plus, they allow members to add details to their profiles that let others know a little more about themselves, if they chose to do so. Those fields are not needed, but I do not see them as harmful.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604
Rep:
Do you think LQ would be improved by removing them? They only appear on a members' profile page, and I can certainly think of situations where the information could be useful.
Sort of a "whatever" thought on my part. I do wonder how many people have actual profile photos. And then I rapidly stop wondering. Since all that stuff is non-mandatory and not verified, I see no big deal either way excepting that maybe some persons can consider reaching out to fellow members based on this. Myself I rarely update anything and similarly do not visit member's profiles unless I clicked on it by accident.
Meh. If you just want to go by my rep, and not check and see. That I am not all that and a can of beans.
My about me page can set you straight.
I guess to some folks here. That make me look like a spammer. To others. It shows me as a real dude. Not a poser. Like some.
I did sometimes get PM's on my outside interests because of "my about me" section.
It shows me as a real dude. Not a poser. Like some.
I did sometimes get PM's on my outside interests because of "my about me" section.
Definitely. Since this is a board composed of volunteers and not a help centre with paid support staff, personalised profile pages can give members a bit of a "real person" aura. So I do not see a problem with it and some people will find it useful. I seriously doubt the majority of people who fill in those fields are spammers. But then, most of the profiles I have visited are for members who have been around for a while.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.