LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Well if the majority of members want this new forum, so be it. I've tried to make a point about what may happen.
I guess if everybody is going to be extra careful with it I could accept it.
And don't get me wrong, I have nothing against virtualization and I know that it can be a great solution sometimes, it's just that it's being used for hosting WinShit OS too and with that in mind is logical to assume that this new forum will in one way or another have questions and answers WinShit OS related.
That's what I don't like about it.
Also, I believe that Linux - General and even Linux - Software and Linux - Networking are perfectly qulified forums to cover this topic.
In less than 1 second with Google I've found http://virt.kernelnewbies.org/, which IMO basically covers and provides links to all that average user would like to know about virtualization.
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789
Rep:
I don't see why we should reject Windows related questions coming from members of the LQ community.
About the topic, I'm wondering if locating virtualization under Linux might not be too restrictive. Most virtualization technologies are inherently cross OSes so I would prefer a generic forum (same way as Programming) where could also be discussed OpenSolaris zones, BSD Jails and other non Gnu/Linux specific solutions as while as Linux supported technologies like VirtualBox where neither the host nor the guest would be a Gnu/Linux distro.
...and I do agree with him on most of the things he said below;
Torvalds also said virtualization is “not that big of a deal” and he predicted that new ways of users interacting with operating systems will represent the key changes in the computing industry.
Virtualization has “been around for probably 50 years. I forget when IBM started offering virtualization on their big hardware. Maybe not 50 years, but it’s been all around for decades and it’s very interesting in niche markets - I think the people who expected to change things radically are just fooling themselves,” Torvalds said. “But also, I’d actually expect that new form factor is in new input and output devices. If we actually end up getting projection displays on cell phones, that might actually change how people start thinking of hardware and that, in turn, might change how we interact and how we use operating systems. But virtualization will not be it."
So just because Linus isn't in favor of Virtualization, we shouldn't have a forum for members to post such questions? When did Linus become the benevolent dictator over LQ? I fail to see this as valid reasoning behind not helping others and a place where people can post VM questions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alan_ri
Also, I believe that Linux - General and even Linux - Software and Linux - Networking are perfectly qulified forums to cover this topic.
I also see those as valid forums for such questions, if it's not at all related to the VM software as the culprit behind the problems.
If it's an actual OS issue or software on OS that happens to be a VM, it fits perfectly into a number of other forums.
There's a recent thread that got shoved into General because the OP was asking about VMware ESX, which is technically Linux that supports the VM's but it got moved saying it's not Linux related, which I fail to agree with since VMware ESX actually uses a Linux kernel and many other bits of software to make it run.
With the rise of native in-kernel virtualization, I think the time for a "Linux - Virtualization" forum may be upon us. Is there anyone who would be against such a forum?
--jeremy
While Virtualization is something I may never use, I don't see valid reason to be against the forum. At the very least, it would help 'unclutter' other forums.
I'm all for it. I've had two old Slackware releases (3.5 and 8.1) running in Qemu, and Haiku and XP Pro running in VirtualBox. All using Slackware (12.2 and 13.0) as the host.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,605
Rep:
Based on the feedback in this thread I'll likely create a Linux - Virtualization forum sometime early next week. If you have any additional feedback on this topic, let us know ASAP.
No XavierP, I was referring to the cake below the pinguin below Jeremy's name (the avatar). In my browser I see a little tiny birthday cake with one candle just below the avatar.
Don't you see the cake? Or have you already eaten it?
+1 from me for a virtualization forum. We are using it heavily here at work, and having a dedicated forum here at LQ would be something that I think would be very useful
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.