LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,605
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtmistler
@MensaWater,
I've recently noticed that you seem to be promoting your own policy here already within at least the Non-Nix General forum by way of replying to threads where you have your distaste with a single post, single word, "Facebook" which is entirely non-relevant to the original poster's intent.
Therefore this policy you're talking about by way of removing items from the zero reply list to suit your needs is something you are already doing.
The LQ Rules are pretty clear on not posting if you don't have something constructive to add. That said, we're getting very near the point where political topics are going to be explicitly banned for a period of time. I was against doing this and have avoided it up until now, but the shear volume and nature of them is becoming untenable.
LQ has an ignore list for users (and has since almost the beginning).
--jeremy
Yes but at lease one of the users doing the posts I'm talking about is a moderator (not the one replying in this thread). Ignoring a moderator might cause problems later.
Yes but at lease one of the users doing the posts I'm talking about is a moderator (not the one replying in this thread). Ignoring a moderator might cause problems later.
I know who you're talking about. Immediately after he was made a moderator, I contacted Jeremy privately about that decision and pointed out the posting history that he already had.
When I tried to add that moderator to my ignore list, the forum told me I couldn't ignore a moderator.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,605
Rep:
While you cannot ignore a mod, all rules still apply to mods. Feel free to contact me directly if you ever feel there's an issue in that regard. Note that mods probably shouldn't be participating heavily in General, so that's a separate issue I'm happy to discuss.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.