LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
No, I would like my reading experience to have less garbage noise, much like your post here... It accomplishes nothing other than wasting both my and your time...
I easily skim past that as an opinion( rant even...)
even some technical answers* can only be opinions and what can happen if people can't handle opinions or each other‽
Last edited by jamison20000e; 12-02-2017 at 04:01 AM.
^ I'll say it one more time:
the "Ignore User" option already exists.
I am discussing possible improvements to an existing feature; your replies seem to question the feature as such.
And it has nothing to do with surpressing unwanted opinion.
still, some folks seem to be taking all this strangely personally.
I can't see how knowing that an irritating person has just made a presumably pointless post is a major issue! Incidentally, I have only two people on my ignore list, both of whom have posted in this thread…
yeah well. my feature request still stands, make this more configurable.
jeremy hasn't deemed to respond, not even declining it.
so i guess i'll just try the feature as is now, and see if it gives me a little relief over time...
PS:
the following would also seem a sensible addition to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by !!!
To allow ignore to be more spontaneous &faster than going digging in 'My UserCP/profile/options/settings' to Edit Ignore List, I'd suggest:
Add an option to: clicking on the username:
Add <poster> to your ignore list
(after the current choices of:
View Public profile
...
Find More Posts by <poster>
Add <poster> to Your Contacts
[&maybe drop rarely-used choices, like Reviews&HCL])
+1 for 'try it'. You may discover, as I did, just knowing xyz is on your ignore list,
will change your emotion of "teased" to 'relieved', knowing xyz is (semi)gone!!!
No, I would like my reading experience to have less garbage noise, much like your post here... It accomplishes nothing other than wasting both my and your time...
being that your seven hundred and seventy seventh post and with Slackware I don't think any should have permission to say shut-up so make it a big red push button‽
Always seemed a bit childish to me: "I'm putting you on my ignore list.", like: "I'm not playing with you any more."
EDIT
I'd rather tell the offending (?) person exactly what I think of them, and probably get banned for it.
It is not really true. This forum is free, so anyone can join. And sometimes someone posted several (hundred) messages before locked out - forever.
Yes, ignoring someone is not obviously childish...
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604
Rep:
Thanks for the feedback. We have no plans to change the Ignore functionality at this time, but do feel free to continue discussing. Based on feedback, we may decide to make changes in the future.
^ thanks for the reply.
it's good to know i'm not being ignored
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL
Always seemed a bit childish to me: "I'm putting you on my ignore list.", like: "I'm not playing with you any more."
it seems some people here are not able to discuss the issue in a detached manner, taking it strangely personally.
you're not the first one in this thread, brianL.
but i agree, putting someone on my ignore list and saying it out loud to everyone, that would also be childish.
Quote:
I'd rather tell the offending (?) person exactly what I think of them, and probably get banned for it.
for me it's not only about annoying, or differences in opinion.
i'm getting annoyed easily, and if i put everyone who annoys me or disagrees with me on my ignore list, there wouldn't be much left to do.
but there are some special case where it's simply best to walk away.
i wish i was that magnanimous that i could just do that - walk away, close the tab, scroll over their post - but i'm not.
fwiw, i'm testing the feature now as it is.
i bet some people's tiny egos get all upset now because they think it's surely them...
The last year or two here I have began to utilize ignore less frequently, and decided I wouldn't want Jeremy pissed at me,
and don't shit where I eat, as it were.
What I wanted to avoid is I didn't want my next response be "the reason" someone is out there talking smack about the/our/my! LQ Community.
I'm eccentric and have impulse control issues.
I value my participation on this site.
Easier to ignore than wind up in the shit.
But that's just me.
Peace.
Last edited by Habitual; 12-05-2017 at 04:12 PM.
Reason: s/in this site/on this site/
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.