LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Interesting concept. I had to read the sourceforge description to find out what the heck the purpose of the kernel was, but great idea Jeremy. A Linux kernel for the newbies. Maybe I'll try when I install Slackware soon.
Long story short about patching +LQ +Grsecurity, adding header file and quick peek at sched.* there's too much errors -Walling by at compile time. I *will* test this, but this ain't the day for combing over a source tree...
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Open and FreeBSD, all other distro's suck :)
Posts: 3
Rep:
Indeed! Thanks Jeremy
Will you be adding things such as XFS support and the pre-emptive RML kernel patch? (I know the rml patch is merged into 2.5 stock kernel, but I don't much want to run 2.5 )
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Original Poster
Rep:
No specific plans for XFS at this time. preempt and/or low latency will be considered soon though. Some ReiserFS stuff will probably also go into -lq2.
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Open and FreeBSD, all other distro's suck :)
Posts: 3
Rep:
Ya, as far as the XFS support, I personally use XFS on some of my systems. While ext3 is nice, xfs provides some great stability. All my Gentoo boxes run it by default, and generally when I patch my linux kernels for other distro's i add xfs support
yes go for it
may i request adding Andre Hedrick IDE patch "but it's for the 2.4.18 only" if possible ? ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/
it corrects my IDE controller problems "hangs on booting any 2.4 kernel"
Thanks!
how about improving upon the ntfs file system suppot, i'd like to write to my windows drive. i know the current kernel does support this already but it's listed as experimental, i dont want to screw anything up. from what i've heard firewire support has much to be desired in linux as well. i dont know if this is what you meant by suggestions but i thought i'd through it out there anyways.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.