LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-31-2002, 08:06 AM   #16
rverlander
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: A few
Posts: 488

Rep: Reputation: 30

http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?...xquestions.org
Why the hell is kernel.linuxquestions.org running Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) PHP/4.2.2 on Solaris 8???????????
 
Old 08-31-2002, 09:17 AM   #17
tarballedtux
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Off the coast of Madadascar
Posts: 498

Rep: Reputation: 30
Thumbs up

Interesting concept. I had to read the sourceforge description to find out what the heck the purpose of the kernel was, but great idea Jeremy. A Linux kernel for the newbies. Maybe I'll try when I install Slackware soon.

--tarballedtux
 
Old 08-31-2002, 10:57 AM   #18
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
The FM release is here - http://freshmeat.net/projects/linuxquestions/

As to the OS of kernel.linuxquestions.org - it will change machines soon, but it is a resource I needed to use for now.

--jeremy
 
Old 08-31-2002, 12:37 PM   #19
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600
src + lq + grsecurity

Long story short about patching +LQ +Grsecurity, adding header file and quick peek at sched.* there's too much errors -Walling by at compile time. I *will* test this, but this ain't the day for combing over a source tree...
 
Old 08-31-2002, 02:29 PM   #20
jMh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Open and FreeBSD, all other distro's suck :)
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Definetly look into adding grsecurity into the patch, it's got some nifty security features. www.grsecurity.net
 
Old 08-31-2002, 03:31 PM   #21
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
OK. grsecurity merged with no problems, so it will most likely be included in -lq2.

--jeremy
 
Old 08-31-2002, 03:56 PM   #22
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600
Thanks very much Jeremy!
 
Old 08-31-2002, 04:00 PM   #23
jMh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Open and FreeBSD, all other distro's suck :)
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Indeed! Thanks Jeremy
Will you be adding things such as XFS support and the pre-emptive RML kernel patch? (I know the rml patch is merged into 2.5 stock kernel, but I don't much want to run 2.5 )
 
Old 08-31-2002, 04:13 PM   #24
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
No specific plans for XFS at this time. preempt and/or low latency will be considered soon though. Some ReiserFS stuff will probably also go into -lq2.

--jeremy
 
Old 08-31-2002, 06:45 PM   #25
rverlander
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: A few
Posts: 488

Rep: Reputation: 30
Why no XFS plans?
 
Old 08-31-2002, 08:00 PM   #26
jMh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Open and FreeBSD, all other distro's suck :)
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Ya, as far as the XFS support, I personally use XFS on some of my systems. While ext3 is nice, xfs provides some great stability. All my Gentoo boxes run it by default, and generally when I patch my linux kernels for other distro's i add xfs support
 
Old 09-01-2002, 12:53 AM   #27
rverlander
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Distribution: A few
Posts: 488

Rep: Reputation: 30
Please consider adding TUX patches that allow usage of TUX webserver without re-compiling kernel
 
Old 09-01-2002, 08:16 AM   #28
uniball
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Distribution: Debian woody
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
yes go for it
may i request adding Andre Hedrick IDE patch "but it's for the 2.4.18 only" if possible ?
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/
it corrects my IDE controller problems "hangs on booting any 2.4 kernel"
Thanks!

Last edited by uniball; 09-01-2002 at 08:19 AM.
 
Old 09-01-2002, 01:32 PM   #29
Goatdemon
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: The good 'ol USofA
Distribution: ArchLinux - Slackware 8.1
Posts: 398

Rep: Reputation: 30
how about improving upon the ntfs file system suppot, i'd like to write to my windows drive. i know the current kernel does support this already but it's listed as experimental, i dont want to screw anything up. from what i've heard firewire support has much to be desired in linux as well. i dont know if this is what you meant by suggestions but i thought i'd through it out there anyways.
 
Old 09-04-2002, 04:05 PM   #30
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
For those of you who use BitKeeper you can also get the LQ kernel from:

http://linuxquestions.bkbits.net/

--jeremy
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
kernel.org patch question Falcon006 Linux - General 3 10-20-2005 10:04 PM
When will OpenOffice.org 2 be released? jstars Linux - Software 1 08-07-2005 12:32 AM
Linuxquestions.org bullium LQ Suggestions & Feedback 6 01-03-2005 03:18 PM
LinuxQuestions.org will be in the .Org Village at LWE UK jeremy LQ Suggestions & Feedback 34 10-10-2004 09:41 AM
thank you linuxquestions.org p_murugappan General 0 07-12-2001 11:02 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration