LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I think what makes it look ugly is the fact that because the information is placed/wrapped to the right of the Tags section, the report/quote/tags buttons are no longer aligned with each other.
IMO, It'd look a lot tidier if the information was moved to it's own line below the existing layout, in a similar way to how the thanks are done.
(viewing with Opera here, I don't know whether the same occurs under firefox).
1 members found this post helpful.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
I think what makes it look ugly is the fact that because the information is placed/wrapped to the right of the Tags section, the report/quote/tags buttons are no longer aligned with each other.
IMO, It'd look a lot tidier if the information was moved to it's own line below the existing layout, in a similar way to how the thanks are done.
(viewing with Opera here, I don't know whether the same occurs under firefox).
Agreed. And yes, it is the same with Firefox.
FWIW, I think the Blue Thumb can be removed, and either the Thanks count increase with 'yes' votes, or it can be completely removed, as well.
With all these new addition, something should definitely be done about the layout.
Take a look at 2 screenshots I made.
The first one (lq.current.png) is the current situation, the second (lq.clean.png) is what I see at home (done with addsweep, I'm still happy that GrapefruiTgirl pointed this out to me).
Tastes may differ, but one must agree that the second one is a lot easier on the eyes.......
The only thing I cannot get rid of is the Thanked: XXX in the left bar :-)
Today while reading some response to a technical problem I found it to be useful, but I accidentally clicked 'no' due to mouse problems. I could'nt find any way to re-vote the post !! Will it not be better if the members do have a choice of re-considering their desicion regarding voting.
Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 11-27-2009 at 12:36 AM.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by anishakaul
Today while reading some response to a technical problem I found it to be useful, but I accidentally clicked 'no' due to mouse problems. I could'nt find any way to re-vote the post !! Will it not be better if the members do have a choice of re-considering their desicion regarding voting.
We don't plan on allowing you to change your vote at this time, but we'll keep it in mind for a future enhancement.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604
Rep:
The new "Did you find this post helpful" system has now been used over 200 times. In order to get additional feedback, I'm going to start rolling it out to additional forums now. The functionality will not appear in non-technical forums such as General, Member Intro or Syndicated News. Thanks for the feedback so far, keep it coming.
Does anyone else find the new wording confusing? The box is completely outside of any post, and "this post" is a link to a different post.
--jeremy
Actually, I don't think it's the wording as much as the placement. IOW, being under a post makes it appear to refer to that post. It did take a second look to realize that "this post" was, in fact, a link.
Well, I can see where it could be confusing the way it is. I think the placement needs to stay the way it is, and to clarify any misunderstandings, change the wording. Perhaps:
Code:
Automatically jump to <a href="URL to POST">the post</a> that LQ members have voted the most helpful in this thread.
or perhaps
Code:
Automatically jump to the post that LQ members have voted <a href="URL to POST">the most helpful</a> in this thread.
Just a suggestion again. I don't think that wording similar to that could possibly imply the line goes with the post.
Well, I can see where it could be confusing the way it is. I think the placement needs to stay the way it is, and to clarify any misunderstandings, change the wording. Perhaps:
Code:
Automatically jump to <a href="URL to POST">the post</a> that LQ members have voted the most helpful in this thread.
or perhaps
Code:
Automatically jump to the post that LQ members have voted <a href="URL to POST">the most helpful</a> in this thread.
Just a suggestion again. I don't think that wording similar to that could possibly imply the line goes with the post.
Forrest
Personally, I think the new wording looks much neater; However, I concede that if it were changed back to the original, or to one of your suggestions, then the placement would be nearly irrelevant.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604
Rep:
Just a quick usage update. Since rolling this feature out to all non-technical forums 3 days ago, the system has been used well over 500 times. Over 85% of those have been "Yes" answers. All feedback so far is appreciated, keep it coming.
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,630
Rep:
Good idea, Jeremy. And I think we are (mostly) grown-ups here, and so can live with a "no" (not helpful). After swallowing the disappointment it might even give an incentive to improve ones contributions.
I rarely use the thumbs up symbol, but I said "thank you" quite often...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.