LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General > LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories
User Name
Password
LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories Just spent four hours configuring your favorite program? Just figured out a Linux problem that has been stumping you for months?
Post your Linux Success Stories here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-31-2006, 10:30 PM   #1
sdexp
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: USA
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux
Posts: 103

Rep: Reputation: 15
SuSE Found the Most Flexible Distribution


After many years of trying out Linux distributions (mostly because of lack of support of something in one or the other, such as extensions in PHP5 or package management without sources), I finally found the holy grail.

This holy grail turns out to be the most natural (pun intended) of those distributions on the list--SuSE Linux!

Ever since installing SuSE 10.1 I have felt that I have been living in a cave using a distribution released only several years back--Mandrake 9.2. That's how overwhelmingly awesome it is.

The only drawback may be that disk space must be ample (10 GB is average) just for the operating system. Memory like that comes fairly cheap now though, so that shouldn't be a problem.

All of my devices were detected and configured. Yes, every single one of them, from both onboard and PCI ethernet, sound card, video card, usb drives, and parallel port printer. That was so unusual that I almost underwent an euphoria to understand how such could be possible.

As a conclusion to help all those distribution-watchers out there, here are some of SuSE's strong points:

Flexible

By flexible I mean it allows you to choose whether you want to use the graphical configuration utilities or modify configuration using a terminal manually. This works quite well, especially because the graphical configuration utilities are not dumbed down as are Windows', allowing variability.

I must mention though that I had to reinstall my kernel to get the parallel port working. At least that option was available through YaST. What a wonderful OS.

Suitable for Servers

SuSE is pretty high on security. It has a fully customizable firewall and with that a security-enhanced configuration for its Apache HTTPD and MySQL servers.

Reliable

You can always boot into SuSE using the CD used to install it, in case GRUB or something else wasn't configured right originally. This way the bootloader can be fixed.

Partitioning of hard drives works fairly smoothly. Only the root partition of a drive with many partitions can be formatted if desired.

Variability

The packages in SuSE are so widespread that it could take almost an hour or two to choose which ones to keep. Fortunately I had that time and it turns out that they all work just great.

So there's my experience. I hope it's convincing to some Linux aspirants (newbie seems to have a derogatory connotation).

Is there a way to take a screenshot of the whole desktop (not just one window)?
 
Old 08-01-2006, 01:03 AM   #2
chief_officer
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Istanbul, TR
Distribution: Red Hat, CentOS, Ubuntu
Posts: 181

Rep: Reputation: 30
You can use ksnapshot to take the screenshot of the whole desktop.
 
Old 08-01-2006, 09:31 AM   #3
stees
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Distribution: OpenSuse 11, Red Hat, Fedora
Posts: 34

Rep: Reputation: 15
i have been using fedora core5 for some time now. i was thinking of switching to debian, but this post makes me reconsider suse. but someone on this board told me to stay away from "bloated" distro's....
 
Old 08-02-2006, 01:00 AM   #4
AwesomeMachine
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: USA and Italy
Distribution: Debian testing/sid; OpenSuSE; Fedora; Mint
Posts: 5,524

Rep: Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015
SuSE 10.1 is good. I have it on one machine. But, linux distros are like beautiful, classy women. You never want to settle for just one. You need some variety. Otherwise you get bored. SuSE 10.1 gets very boring, really quick. She is an easy lay. Guys want a distro that holds out a little, not one that gives everything up on the first date. Sure, if your desperate to get something done, and all the other girls have headaches, or you can't figure them out, rely on the old standby, SuSE, because she is the easiest.
 
Old 08-03-2006, 06:54 PM   #5
sdexp
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: USA
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux
Posts: 103

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
That is true to some extent. SuSE does make some tasks way too easy. But my philosophy is that if one knows to do something the hard way and remembers it, then it is just fine to take the easy path and make modifications along the way as necessary.

SuSE is very stable and thus I think I'll stick with it for a long time.
 
Old 08-08-2006, 04:16 PM   #6
esvcx
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
I've been using SuSE for a while started on 9.1 and now on 10.1

I think it's great. Fortunately it was my first distro after windows and made the transition very smooth. Only little niggles that allowed me to learn Linux by solving them but not being too difficult as to make me give up and go back.

I think SuSE has a very important role as it may be the key to luring over the 'unclean'
 
Old 08-15-2006, 10:24 AM   #7
Mikeyh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Distribution: Suse 11.1
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
I have tried distro after distro, and i have to say SuSE is the most successful so far. I am now using it on my clunky old dell latitude laptop with wireless. it all works.

The Down Side?

SuSE, is going the way of microsoft. With Novell running the show now, they have taken Linux away from the open source concept, and only offering some products to those who pay. That goes against the whole concept of what linux was all about.

It is bloated, but then it supports pretty much all of the common WINDOWS hardware, which is what most retailers sell these days.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
anyone know linux like ipcop, but more flexible? xcore_on Linux - Newbie 4 05-13-2006 10:49 AM
Do I need something more flexible than Firestarter? rickh Linux - Security 3 01-05-2006 09:57 AM
A flexible rc.firewall script Woodsman Slackware 3 11-18-2005 07:16 PM
most flexible distro puishor Linux - General 2 06-26-2005 04:45 AM
Can't install [any linux distribution] due to ieee1394 cd drive not being found. cpoet Linux - Newbie 0 11-22-2003 08:02 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General > LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration