Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I use mandrake 9.2. I've heard firefox 0.8 is better than mozilla (1.6) . Is this true? If yes in which way?(is it lets say faster?more convinient?more secure?)
It's hard for anyone to decide for you. Try it and see for yourself.
Firefox can be installed in under a minute as it's pre-compiled. Simply un-tar. run and enjoy.
If you want opinions though, I like firefox better. It's fast and simple. I run it on my windows boxes at work too. me so happy.....
Mozilla is more then just a web browser. I also use it for mail, and have even used its WUSIWUG editer, and also used it for IRC. For a person like me it is prefered.
If you only will uuse it for webbrowsing, then maybe firefox would be prefered.
Distribution: Fedora Core 1 & WinXP Pro & Gentoo 1.4 & Arch Linux
Posts: 558
Rep:
I tried firefox for two weeks and found a few niches that Mozilla had that I prefered over firefox so I went back to Mozilla, whew...long breath.
In Mozilla you can set the mouse scroll to a number of lines at a time whereas in Firefox I couldn't find this option.
When using an e-mail program other than mozilla (while using firefox) it won't open a new window from a link in the e-mail if another instance of firefox is currently open.
These are two that stood out to me, there were others but I can't remember them off the top of my head. Overall, I think firefox is a good, fast web-browser but I prefer the multi-functionality (good scrabble word lol) of Mozilla instead.
Originally posted by itsjustme Which "bells and whistles" is that??
I'm just asking. I don't have firefox.
u should read more carefully because rberry88 already answered this question. mozilla has build in e-mail support, irc + alot of other usefull (and some not) applications.
I was talking with a buddy of mine yesterday that worked for AOL. He apparently knew some of the developers of Mozilla and was told that when they pulled Firebird and Thunderbird out of Mozilla, they didn't just leave behind the other components. Apparently they also left behind a bunch of old, entangled, buggy code. Apparently the separation enabled an easier flushing of the system.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.