Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Which common applications still use TCP wrappers, these days ?
i.e. which software is compiled with the libwrap library which requires editing of the hosts.allow and hosts.deny files to allow access.
The following are compiled with libwrap that I can think of :
Code:
portmap
nfs
sshd
With xinetd, I can see that it's linked with the libwrap library, however what always confuses me is that you can specify the hosts in xinetd.conf. So should xinetd services IP allow access lists also be configured in hosts.allow and hosts.deny ?
Which common applications still use TCP wrappers, these days ?
See for yourself:
Code:
find ${PATH//:/ } /opt -type f | while read ITEM; do ldd "${ITEM}" 2>/dev/null|grep -m1 -q libwrap && rpm -qf "${ITEM}" --qf="%{NAME}\n"; done
Quote:
Originally Posted by dazdaz
should xinetd services IP allow access lists also be configured in hosts.allow and hosts.deny ?
No, Xinetd uses its own configuration files only.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dazdaz
Generally speaking, is libwrap deprecated ?
As long as you understand the caveats listed in the documentation and as long as you are aware that packets are passed on to and processed by the application, instead of being blocked at the network level like you would have Netfilter do, it's still useful as part of a multi-layered approach to access restriction.
Actually, xinetd can use TCP Wrappers settings http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_boo...-wrappers.html, but to avoid confusion, some people stick with TCP Wrappers only for those that have it built-in and xinetd ctrl for those that don't.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.