Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Or do they merely offer a different GUI to the same capabilities already built in to Firefox 93.0?
I have used the add-ons "Download Manager (S3)", "Simple Mass Downloader", and "Turbo Download Manager (3rd edition)". Does using any or all of them offer any advantages?
You'll have to suit yourself on that. curl and wget are the best downloaders that I know of, and using them forces one to learn how web pages work. How content is generated and delivered on a web page. Learning how something works is more important than the tool one uses to do something. Using a tool that magically does something without you knowing how it works, not that profitable.
Why, exactly, do you need the 'nuts and bolts' of how programs work, to determine if it's worth using??? If the plugin does what you want/need it to do, then for you, *IT IS WORTH USING*. Because unless you want to learn programming, then download the source code for things (when it's available), and analyze it, there's little point...pick something that works for you...use it.
I have often downloaded a 400mb file to find that at the last moment when the download is 99.9% or more finished there is an error and it has to be done again and often again before it is finally obtained. The error I saw once was "file not found".
More recently when I have downloaded a similar file with all the above add-ons disabled, there has not been any problem. So it could suggest that the add-ons, either alone or in combination, have a bug.
I was hoping that an expert could say if the add-ons merely use the Firefox built-in downloader, or use their own program for downloading. If the former then not much point in using them.
However I have tried the experiment of pausing a download and then closing Firefox. It was not possible to resume the download after opening Firefox again, but one of the add-ons does allow this.
Last edited by grumpyskeptic; 10-24-2021 at 09:53 AM.
Try to learn from past experiences/advice/knowledge, and ask a meaningful question, please.
Quote:
I have often downloaded a 400mb file to find that at the last moment when the download is 99.9% or more finished there is an error and it has to be done again and often again before it is finally obtained. The error I saw once was "file not found".
More recently when I have downloaded a similar file with all the above add-ons disabled, there has not been any problem. So it could suggest that the add-ons, either alone or in combination, have a bug.
As with many of your threads, you omit anything that could be meaningful. Saying "downloaded a similar file" means nothing...downloaded HOW? From where? Same site/file? Different site? VPN? TOR? Version/distro of Linux?? Why is it a 'bug', versus the download site being busy? Your 'modified' old DSL router that you 'patched' for security? Can't possibly be those??? https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ed-4175698764/ https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...sp-4175698884/
And disabling add-ons is pointless, if you don't USE the add on to download with.
Quote:
I was hoping that an expert could say if the add-ons merely use the Firefox built-in downloader, or use their own program for downloading. If the former then not much point in using them. However I have tried the experiment of pausing a download and then closing Firefox. It was not possible to resume the download after opening Firefox again, but one of the add-ons does allow this.
Back to "not providing details"....which add-on(s) are you talking about? And also back to what boughtonp said...read the program/add-on descriptions, and if you have a question about how they work, then *ASK THE PEOPLE WHO WROTE THEM*. How are we going to know how those add-ons work? If you want to know, then that's research you need to do.
Sorry, but your question is both meaningless and unanswerable. Asking someone else if a thing is 'worth using' is only gong to get their opinion...since you still provide zero details, and now want to change your original question to be "how does some unspecified add-on to some version of Firefox (neither of which I'm going to tell you), work?"?? We don't know, and if you want to know then YOU need to ask the people who wrote them, or look up the documentation yourself. We're not going to do it for you.
Barring any of that, you are 100% able to use your computer and write your OWN downloader that you know is free from bugs and any spyware. You will also have the documentation for it, won't you? Linux gives you compilers, editors, libraries, and access to ALL the docs on how to use them; there is your solution.
I have often downloaded a 400mb file to find that at the last moment when the download is 99.9% or more finished there is an error and it has to be done again and often again before it is finally obtained. The error I saw once was "file not found".
Code:
wget -c <url goes here>
Solves that problem. But in terminal. Not browser.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.