Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Both Mandrake and Windows can be made more secure than they are "out of the box". For both you should regularly add security patches, use strong passwords, disable any un-necessary services, use a Firewall, run in a Limited user account etc etc...(as far as is poss with Windows). One notable feature with Mandrake is its securty levels - with a simple click you can change security level - and within each level you can fine-grain options further - the "higher" level is "tight" - almost claustraphobic
Plus of course with linux you have a firewall system build into the kernel, and regular updates to every piece of software, as well as being able to see and turn off unwanted services (unlike windows and its recent spate of RPC exploits). An important point is unix/linux systems were designed to be secure terminals for many users which connected to a central mainframe, whereas windows was designed as a stand alone single user desktop with security and networking added as an afterthough.
Another point worth mentioning is the tendancy for XP Home users to run in an Admin account instead of utilising XP Home's "Limited account" feature - contrast this with a typical desktop Linux user that'd typically always run in a limited priviledge user account.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.