Which do you trust more EPEL or RPM forge ? CentOS6
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Which do you trust more EPEL or RPM forge ? CentOS6
I just installed CentOS 6, and I want to enable a third party repository. I don't feel comfortable having both of them enabled even with yum plugins like "protection" and "priorities". Which of the two do you trust better ? Do they both come with the multimedia codecs ?
why would you not be happy with both? Personally I prefer rpmforge, as dag wieers is a nice guy. but I wouldn't feel in the slightest bit uncomfortable with both. EPEL tends not to overlap with rpmforge that much, they deliberately don't have the same focus, also see atrpms which is very useful and simialr to rpmforge.
why would you not be happy with both? Personally I prefer rpmforge, as dag wieers is a nice guy. but I wouldn't feel in the slightest bit uncomfortable with both. EPEL tends not to overlap with rpmforge that much, they deliberately don't have the same focus, also see atrpms which is very useful and simialr to rpmforge.
I have very little experience with YUM so I don't want to break anything
If you set priorities (I use 1 for CentOS, 2 for EPEL, 3 for RPMfusion) nothing bad will happen!
The various repositories have different items. EPEL is Fedora stuff that Red Hat doesn't think its clients need, like Dia. PRMfusion has the things that were never in Fedora to start with, like the media codecs. But the dependencies overlap, so that's why you need priorities.
Thank you so much your replies. I have finally set-up both repositories with priorities. Base is given the highest with RPMforge the lowest.
I've install Codeblocks just fine with EPEL. Now I'm trying to install VLC and get the following output.
Error: Package: vlc-1.1.13-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
Requires: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
Error: Package: vlc-1.1.13-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
Requires: libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit)
Error: Package: vlc-1.1.13-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
Requires: libmatroska.so.2()(64bit)
Error: Package: vlc-1.1.13-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
Requires: libupnp.so.3()(64bit)
Error: Package: vlc-1.1.13-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
Requires: libebml.so.2()(64bit)
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
Those packages are included with RPMforge, but does this mean I'm doing something wrong with priorities ?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.