Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi! I downloaded an iso of Fedora 20, and when I burned it with k3b it turns out that I'm a little short. It was supposed to be 4462, and I only got 4429. The second time I burned it I got 4404 instead of 4462. Is that a significant enouhg loss to not install it or should I try a different burner like xfburn? Or could it be in the download? Thanx for what ever info you can pass on. It will be greatly appreciated.
I would check using md5sum check sum to see if your download ISO is valid. This is the md5sum for Fedora 20 'b52130db4067e3e7acf621653abce7ec' You can get this same check sum from Fedora for the version to be tested/compared.
If that does not compare then I suggest to get a new download & check again. You should burn the ISO image at a slow rate, 4 has always been successful for my burner. Takes more time but insures a valid burnt image.
Boot the disk and you'll find the menu has an option to test the disk. This will verify the MD5sums for each file on the disk and report any problems.
I've never had a bad download, but then I live in the heart of a big city with the telephone exchange only a couple of miles away. I've very seldom had a bad burn, but I always take care to use minimum speed.
If your download is OK but you keep getting bad burns, the problems might be the disk or even the drive. I suspect writing to USB is more reliable than burning a disk.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.