Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Adding the kernel-source is not the problem, we are not even getting to the stage where the install would compile against it. I don't see why manually extracting the files should reboot the machine. Is this the only GNU/Linux machine? If not perhaps do the extraction on another machine then transfer the directory to the target machine. I know it must be very frustrating. In the past these older distros were not very forgiving when they got into difficulty.
Another trick I would try is to go through the process of re-installing but not allowing the machine to reformat the drive, just have it overwrite what is there. Something to consider.
The software that you use for the printer, did you install it and if so do you still have the installation files?
I've just looked again at the nvidia installer log. creation time: Tue Jan 1 23:14:26 2002 is this correct for this machine?
Last edited by {BBI}Nexus{BBI}; 07-20-2011 at 01:05 PM.
I'm wondering if trying to install an older version of the driver might work. I've just looked for the oldest archived driver that nvidia have and it's NVIDIA-Linux-x86-96.43.01-pkg1.run for the Ti 4200 and NVIDIA-Linux-x86-256.35.run for the 7100.
Yea that sounds about right as far as when got this box up and running. 2002 is when I got this machine.
I do have a 10.5 mac with terminal on it. I gave it a shot and was able to extract the .run file. In the process of burning that, and getting that over. Hope that works.
Hmm. You might be on to something with the older drivers. How/what would I search for to get those files? When I choose 7100 series it gave me the one I was working with.
When you go to the driver page to select your driver, there is a section below headed Additional Software and Drivers you'll see Beta and Archived Drivers. That is where I saw them.
I'm finding out how to resolve that error. Once I have the answer I will post it here. For now we've hit a block. I'm also trying to locate Mandrake 9.2 cd's so that I can install it here, just in case we end up going the re-install route. I'd like to fresh my memory as to what to expect and how to respond.
Edit: I've located Mandrake 9.2 now.
Last edited by {BBI}Nexus{BBI}; 07-20-2011 at 02:20 PM.
Reason: Additional info added
I looked at the extracted source files for Nvidia 7100 and cannot see how this driver can possibly install by issuing 'make install' There are files that I am expecting to be there that aren't. The NVIDIA-Linux-x86-96.43.19-pkg1.run driver for the Ti 4200 when extracted has the correct elements. If you would like to put that card back in the machine. CD to the NVIDIA-Linux-x86-96.43.19-pkg1/usr/src/nv/ directory and run
Code:
./make install
there it should work.
Last edited by {BBI}Nexus{BBI}; 07-20-2011 at 04:26 PM.
Linux version 2.4.22-10mdkenterprise (nplanel@no.mandrakesoft.com) (gcc version 3.3.1 (Manandrake linux 9.2 3.3.1-2mdk)) #1smp thu sep 18 11:46:49 CEST 2003)
Code:
XFree86 -version/Xorg -version
This one returned a list of options. Not sure what you were looking for.
Code:
insmod --version
same thing with this, it just gave a list of insmod options.
Code:
size --version
GNU size 2.14.90.0.5020030722
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Code:
make --version
GNU Make 3.80
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Code:
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-2mdk)
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Code:
ls /lib/libc.so.* > 6
This just created a file called 6 in my directory.
So I re ran the code and put a .txt at the end and here is what the contents read.
XFree version 4.3.0
Release Date: 9 may 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.18-23mdksmp i686 [ELF]
Build Date: 10 September 2003
The insmod --version is still just a list of insmod options. I tried | less to show the top of that list but it doesn't let me scroll to the top of that return
The binutls returned with: binutils-2.14.90.2.5-2mdk
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.