Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
ahhh ...
COLUMNS=210 dpkg -l kernel*
.. now i can see all... but still no difference in reported results.... (I grepped it for net & ip_ta & ipta - nothing)
.. so which kernel should i use..?
... and once i've done that i guess i should upgrade my kernel again?
...might it be easier (and less error-prone) if i just go and re-make the kernel with make menuconfig?
(or will this not fix the module problem?)
??
(i'm beginning to wish i went with fedora)
Each distro has it's specific performance patches included in the sources, but having been down this road, you gotta get used to building kernels before trying it on a real server.. Very surprising things happen if you make one without doing all the homework..
Your kernel-image list looks too short.. There is a package for 686, maybe a lower version number..
oh:
Package kernel-image-2.6.9-2-686 is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package kernel-image-2.6.9-2-686 has no installation candidate
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.