Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm a linux Newbie, and I'm planning on installing Suse onto my computer, I have two hard drives, a 120 gb HD and a 200 gb HD. I plan to use them both with the 200 GB HD holding the OS. Unfortunately, I'm going to need to dual boot XP, also. So I was just wondering what would be the best way to set up the partitions in the drive. For example, would it be best to just convert each to fat 32? Or is there some other way that would work better?
If you are simply putting the operating systems and programs on one HD and storing all your files on another, using the 120Gb HD for the operating systems will be more than enough room for all your programs and such, leaving the entire 200Gb HD for file storage. To make Linux & Windows equally accessible to the storage HD, its filesystem must be readable/writeable by both. Since Linux has limited writing cababilites to the NTFS filesystem, this would be a bad choice. Fat32 would probably work fine for this since both Windows and Linux can access it quite easily.
Make sure you enable the correct file system support when you comile your kernel.
fwiw, here's how i would do it under the "keep it simple" principle:
10GB for XP (NTFS)
X GB for windows applications and data (FAT32)
10GB for linux OS (ext3 or reiser)
X GB for /home
X is however much you think you will need.
i always make the windows OS partition NTFS when dual booting XP, with no NTFS file support in the kernel, under the idea that that would increase the security of my windows install when booted into linux. whether that's true or not i don't know, but it makes sense to me, at least, since i typically don't need to write to my "C:" drive when in linux. where it might be problematic is doing full disk backups from linux, but i handle the windows side of that in windows and so far haven't had a problem.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.