LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-18-2004, 09:39 AM   #76
vectordrake
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 47

That damn USB modem connection and software! Why do they have to rope us? You're experiencing a similar crappy problem to a person who has an unsupported winmodem - except that you can't just go change modems or connection software. If you had problems with the other Windows computer accessing the internet, I'd be sure it was ICS, but that's not the case. I don't like to admit defeat! (perhaps I won't...)
 
Old 04-18-2004, 10:14 AM   #77
FLOODS
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: GA
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 Desktop/Server.
Posts: 361

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I know, I don't know why hughes made the connection use usb instead of cat5. Actually, to think about it, I do.

They made the DW4000 a while ago, I've had it for a few years now.
Later, they make a *new* modem that uses cat5, and they advertise so *any* network can use it.. so I could guess it's a marketing strategy, since it's a few hundred dollars to upgrade.. They're all about making money.

They even rope me with internet. I have no other options out where I live, and satellite is my last resort. So I take it and suck up a huge bill at the end of the month.. plus a $1,000 installation fee.. ouch. Guess it's nice to have good speeds though, even though I do have a 169mb download limit in 4hours..

Can't wait until REAL broadband is offered out here.

PS. Also carrying this topic on at linuxforum.com to see if anyone there has any ideas.. if I get it working I'll be sure to post the solution here.

Also, I downloaded windump (don't know if it was someone here that reccommended it or not..) but it never really *does* anything. just kind of sits there. Supposed to be like tcpdump for windows.

Last edited by FLOODS; 04-18-2004 at 10:24 AM.
 
Old 04-29-2004, 08:53 PM   #78
FLOODS
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: GA
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 Desktop/Server.
Posts: 361

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
update..

still working on this.
Went and bought some crossover cables and hoooked them up, with no luck.
When I turn on the slack machine, xp does bring a box up saying network connection detected etc etc, but I'm still unable to ping or anything.
Guess I'm going to buy a new NIC sometime and see if that's the problem.. if it is I'm going to be so mad at myself... lol
 
Old 04-30-2004, 06:58 AM   #79
Peacedog
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Danville, VA
Distribution: Slackware, Windows, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Mac OS X
Posts: 5,296

Rep: Reputation: 168Reputation: 168
if you can't ping anything what does ifconfig output?
 
Old 04-30-2004, 07:51 PM   #80
FLOODS
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: GA
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 Desktop/Server.
Posts: 361

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
here's ifconfig

Code:
eth0
       Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:08:A1:22:7A:2A
       inet addr:192.168.0.54 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask 255.255.255.0
       UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
       RX packets:391 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
       TX packets:47 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
       collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
       RX bytes:57486 (56.1Kb) TX bytes:1974 (1.9Kb)
       Interrupt:10 Base address:0xec00
I've had the box up for a few days just sitting htere, which explains the almost large amount of receive and transmit. Large for only doing requests, anyways.

Not using the switch right now either. Going to keep the crossover cable in until I can get this up possibly.
 
Old 04-30-2004, 08:26 PM   #81
vectordrake
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 47
Good plan. Fewer weak links in the chain for now.
 
Old 04-30-2004, 08:29 PM   #82
FLOODS
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: GA
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 Desktop/Server.
Posts: 361

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Question before I go out and spend money on a new NIC..

when I run the command lspci, it is detected.
Code:
00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Davicom Semiconductor, Inc. Ethernet 100/10 MBit (rev 40)
Is there a possibility it is still the NIC? Is there any way I can configure the NIC?
 
Old 04-30-2004, 08:50 PM   #83
vectordrake
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 47
Lets review, then.

Right now, you have the XP box connected to the USB modem.
Your the machines are connected via ethernet with a crossover cable.

How is the Slack box getting its IP? DHCP? Or did you set it static?
Can the XP box "see" the Slack box?
Do either see with ping?

Is your ICS set to the right adaptors?
Your NIC on the XP box needs to be an internal address and the DHCP server needs to be on that interface(if you use DHCP).
Your usb interface needs to be the "sharing interface" to route.

On the client, you need:
dhcpd to run if you're getting an ip via dhcp
/etc/network/interfaces to have eth0 and its IP (192.168.0.x) and gateway listed with the XP IP (which is usually 192.168.0.1)
/etc/resolv.conf to have your DNS nameserver IP listed
Your ethernet module needs to be loaded for this to even work at all (which ifconfig has shown to be true).

Is there anything that I have written that is not the same on your setup? Did I leave anything out?

I'm just trying to bring this back to basics and see if we are missing something small.
 
Old 04-30-2004, 09:00 PM   #84
FLOODS
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: GA
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 Desktop/Server.
Posts: 361

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
the slack box is static.
the xp box can't see the slack box, or vice versa.
the slack box can 'see' the ping, which I know by using tcpdump.

ICS is set to the right adapter.
NIC on xp box is set to 192.168.0.1

on slack box, eth0 is set to 192.168.0.54
haven't done the nameserver yet, but I didn't figure I need to while all I am trying to do is either a) ping the host or b) ping outside sites by using their IP's.

Most everything you said is the same as my setup.
 
Old 04-30-2004, 09:04 PM   #85
vectordrake
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 47
Since the requests aren't being dropped, it seems tha tthey are talking. IU wonder if another protocol would work. Have you thought about trying a SOCKS proxy to see if it'll poke through? You could run the little one from AnalogX and see if you could get something going on that (I'm grasping at straws now)
 
Old 04-30-2004, 09:19 PM   #86
FLOODS
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: GA
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 Desktop/Server.
Posts: 361

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I haven't tried another protocol, becuase I've never really strayed away from icmp while setting up networks and seeing if the connections are alive.

What would I need to get from analogx? I looked through, and I don't know which protocols what use, maybe the proxy tool?
 
Old 04-30-2004, 09:21 PM   #87
vectordrake
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 47
I think the server is just called proxy
 
Old 04-30-2004, 09:34 PM   #88
vectordrake
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 47
Where does your dialup account fit in all of this? Do you need it for uploads? Or, are you 2-way?
 
Old 04-30-2004, 09:41 PM   #89
FLOODS
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: GA
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 Desktop/Server.
Posts: 361

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I'm on 2-way, I just have the dialup account for my games that I play online since satellite has such extremely high latency issues (~2seconds)

It doesn't really fit into any of this so far, except I tried using it for ICS to see if that helped any, but didn't.
 
Old 04-30-2004, 09:48 PM   #90
vectordrake
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 47
Ever thought about doing this?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware as gateway (ICS) for WinXP c31c Slackware 3 11-02-2005 02:33 PM
ICS w/ Slackware and WinXP Machine GML3G0 Linux - Networking 3 06-19-2005 01:23 AM
Windows XP as ICS host & Linux as client connection problem ! hemanfan Linux - Networking 3 06-08-2005 04:29 PM
Getting ICS to work with a WinXP host, with satellite internet darkblade Linux - Networking 3 08-17-2004 05:26 PM
Win2K ICS host and Linux client raypen Linux - Networking 3 03-18-2003 12:58 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration