Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am currently thinking of deploying an highend squid box for an ISP on a link of 6Mbps. They are currently using a full load of 5+ Mbps and demands to know how much whether in bits/s or percentage of the 6Mbps he can save.
The squid box is going to be high end on a P4 3.0 GHz, 2G RAM, 2 Ultra-wide SCSI 36.4G disks on different SCSI cards.
If someone can give me benchmarks on their own setups, pls i wont mind coz it will help others who have this same uncertainty. The client is hoping to save @ least 1Mbps on his link.
well you can save plenty, but it's very much dependent on how your users use the web. you should be looking at a bigger cache i expect though. you'd want to keep as much in cache for as long as possible to improve the ratio, but then with a 5mbps conneciton, i presume you aren't really serving *that* many users... any stats to work off of??
as well as caching, you should try looking at compression too. plain html can often compress u pto 50 times, and large images up to 20%, and so save a lot of bandwidth in the first place, regardless of cache sizes.
well you can save plenty, but it's very much dependent on how your users use the web. you should be looking at a bigger cache i expect though. you'd want to keep as much in cache for as long as possible to improve the ratio, but then with a 5mbps conneciton, i presume you aren't really serving *that* many users... any stats to work off of??
as well as caching, you should try looking at compression too. plain html can often compress u pto 50 times, and large images up to 20%, and so save a lot of bandwidth in the first place, regardless of cache sizes.
Chris,
Can you shed more light on how one can setup squid/caching with good compression to get the best out of it please?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.