LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop > Linux - Member Desktop Screenshots
User Name
Password
Linux - Member Desktop Screenshots This forum is for the discussion and display of Linux Desktop screenshots. Please remember that many members browse LQ from work, so NSFW screenshots are not appropriate.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2011, 10:59 AM   #1
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
Talking Xfce screenshots, anyone?


Since the introduction of this new forum by Jeremy (), and since it appears no one has started an Xfce-specific screenie thread yet, I figured I'd start one!

I suppose I'll start it off with my own:

My somewhat Windows-ish setup:

Clean
Dirty (file manager, calculator*, terminal)
"Work" environment (IDE, SDL_GetTicks() man page, dumb little SDL program I wrote )

Yes, I use Compiz as my WM. What of it? Can't a guy appreciate good looks and be a Linux user? Besides that, there is at least one plugin that I use on a regular basis that isn't just for eye candy: Put. With it, you can put the currently-focused window in any of the four screen quadrants, any of the edges, or the center, with just a single key combo. I use Super+<numpad 1-9> myself.

The GTK theme is a custom one I modified from "Murrina-Dark", which was a) far too light to be considered a "dark" theme (IMO), and b) wasn't red to match my laptop…so I turned it into this. What can I say, I likes the shiny look.

Oh, and for those of you who have seen some of my screenshots in the giant (now closed) thread in /General, you may notice that I finally got rid of those "pesky" desktop icons…I finally decided that I don't have a real need for them anymore. I usually either use the little launcher icons down in the panel, or the Run box you can bring up with Alt+F2.

(* - Normally I run galculator in "paper mode", which is just a line input box where you type your equations, and a list box above it that displays both your equation and the answer to it. I switched it to "scientific" mode for this screenshot to make it less boring. )

Last edited by MrCode; 05-31-2011 at 11:00 AM.
 
Old 05-31-2011, 11:26 AM   #2
ButterflyMelissa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,766
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411
Thanks! I'd make the move to XFCE, but I have to be absolutely sure I will not have any more breakage than what I already experience(d)...Gnome3 is...not really my thing. My system cannot run the "normal" mode, so I'm in fall-back...

I'll keep an eye on this thread! Thanks for starting it up!!!

Thor
 
Old 06-02-2011, 06:54 PM   #3
DJRcomputing
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: /usa/pa/manheim
Distribution: Debian 5 + Xfce
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCode View Post
...since it appears no one has started an Xfce-specific screenie thread yet...
The sub-forum had just opened, ya nut! If it's okay with you, I posted mine in its own thread because...I can. And if not okay? Too bad. LOL! Congrats on first thread, though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor_2.0 View Post
Thanks! I'd make the move to XFCE, but I have to be absolutely sure I will not have any more breakage than what I already experience(d)...Gnome3 is...not really my thing. My system cannot run the "normal" mode, so I'm in fall-back...
When Gnome announced 3, I was like, "Cool!" However looking at it further? Yeah, no. For Lenny, it doesn't really matter, but were I running a newer distro, I'd go Xfce 4.8. However, there are no absolutely sure guarantees when it comes computers...or life in general, really.

My observation thus far has been that those who didn't like the fluff & bloat of KDE went Gnome. Felt the same about Gnome? Xfce. Really light & stripped down? LXDE. At least those seem the main four. Now, I think Gnome 3 will drive more to consider Xfce. Though not having tried 4.8, I like Xfce's balance between form, function & weight. Then again, I'm not trying to chase Windows 7 or Mac OS X. *shrug*

Last edited by DJRcomputing; 06-02-2011 at 06:57 PM.
 
Old 06-02-2011, 07:11 PM   #4
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJRcomputing View Post
The sub-forum had just opened, ya nut! If it's okay with you, I posted mine in its own thread because...I can.
You are right, making an unnecessary thread is a very wise decision.

But anyways, XFCE 4.6.2 on Slackware with Xmonad instead of xfwm4.
Desktop
Laptop

Both in an early state, still have to tweak things.
 
Old 06-02-2011, 07:45 PM   #5
DJRcomputing
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: /usa/pa/manheim
Distribution: Debian 5 + Xfce
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
You are right, making an unnecessary thread is a very wise decision.
Ummm...that was kinda the idea. To avoid mega-threads. Otherwise, there might not be many threads in this forum, given the number of DEs. *shrug*
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJRcomputing View Post
Threads could discuss newly discovered hacks, modules, plug-ins, etc, centered around one's screenshot.
But, to each their own, in more ways than one, I suppose. Evvverybody wants to be the one who starts a mega-thread, though...
 
Old 06-02-2011, 10:39 PM   #6
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJRcomputing
The sub-forum had just opened, ya nut!
Yeah, I know…

@TobiSGD

It's funny; by an amazing coincidence, the GTK theme you use on your desktop ("Paranoid") is the one I used to use a while back on my lappy when I was still too lazy to try to make my own.
 
Old 06-03-2011, 01:20 AM   #7
ButterflyMelissa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,766
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411
@DJRcomputing
Quote:
When Gnome announced 3, I was like, "Cool!" However looking at it further? Yeah, no.
Well, granted, it looks nice...if you can run it. My box does not have the hardware to run G3 as intended, so I'm looking/staring at a "stipped-down Lambo", G3 runs in fallback, and that's ... not really that nice.

Besides, the thing (Gnome that is) has had its foot on the brake too long...I need to set stuff in place to speed things up a bit...hence: XFCE...and, yes, you're right:

Quote:
However, there are no absolutely sure guarantees when it comes computers...or life in general, really
So...I'll just have to take the plunge...after a backup and a deep breath...

Thor
 
Old 06-03-2011, 01:46 AM   #8
EricTRA
LQ Guru
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Gibraltar, Gibraltar
Distribution: Fedora 20 with Awesome WM
Posts: 6,805
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297
Hi,

I'm not that creative when it comes to my desktop environment so my screenshot is pretty basic. Just yesterday I installed Xfce 4.8 no my Linux Mint Debian Edition (the Gnome edition) alongside Gnome and since then I'm using it, very much satisfied with it I might add.

Kind regards,

Eric

Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot.jpg
Views:	200
Size:	249.7 KB
ID:	7202
 
Old 06-03-2011, 01:48 AM   #9
ButterflyMelissa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,766
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411
Quote:
alongside Gnome and since then I'm using it
That electrified me..."alongside" - no conflicts?

Cool
 
Old 06-03-2011, 02:03 AM   #10
EricTRA
LQ Guru
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Gibraltar, Gibraltar
Distribution: Fedora 20 with Awesome WM
Posts: 6,805
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297
Hi,

Nope, haven't encountered things I couldn't solve yet

The only thing that bugged me for quite some time was that when using Compiz I couldn't change my workspaces from 2 to 4, nor could I change the cursor size. Turned out, at least for as far as I could find, that there's some kind of bug in Compiz when using it in combination with Xfce. I switched to metacity and everything just works. I use some applications from Gnome, for example Nautilus because of the TortoiseHg plugins for Mercurial. Whenever I feel like going back to Gnome for some reason I just log out, select Gnome and done. But I'm gonna stay with Xfce for a while, it's blazing fast and I like that.

Kind regards,

Eric
 
Old 06-03-2011, 02:09 AM   #11
ButterflyMelissa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,766
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411
Thanks, good to read this...for me, this system is a lifeline, I do have some nine other systems, if they crash, I like it (then i can learn something) but this one system has to keep running...so this assurance helped me out, thanks again...
 
Old 06-03-2011, 02:11 AM   #12
EricTRA
LQ Guru
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Gibraltar, Gibraltar
Distribution: Fedora 20 with Awesome WM
Posts: 6,805
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297Reputation: 1297
Hi,

You're welcome!

Kind regards,

Eric
 
Old 06-03-2011, 08:24 AM   #13
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,753

Rep: Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCode View Post
My somewhat Windows-ish setup:

Clean
Dirty (file manager, calculator*, terminal)
"Work" environment (IDE, SDL_GetTicks() man page, dumb little SDL program I wrote )
I wouldnt call that 'windowsish'. You could always rename 'menu' to 'start', that would be going in the right direction. :P

Its odd seeing the arch icon there, I'm used to the vanilla 'black rat over blue cross'.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJRcomputing View Post
My observation thus far has been that those who didn't like the fluff & bloat of KDE went Gnome. Felt the same about Gnome? Xfce. Really light & stripped down? LXDE. At least those seem the main four. Now, I think Gnome 3 will drive more to consider Xfce. Though not having tried 4.8, I like Xfce's balance between form, function & weight. Then again, I'm not trying to chase Windows 7 or Mac OS X. *shrug*
Probably true in general, but you get weird people like me-

I like KDE4.X. Its a bit of a resouce pig compared to the others in some ways, but when you've got 2GB+ of RAM, who really cares if it your OS uses 250MB or 125MB on boot....

I have never been able to stand gnome. Bluegh.

Xfce 4.X is what I use for systems that dont have a boatload of RAM, or have a poor video card (anything by intel, nVidia GF4 or earlier, ATI 8XXX or earlier).

Lxde- Yuck. Looks like a badly done winXP to me. Not worth it compared to Xfce, it only 'saves' a few MB of RAM use at boot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor_2.0 View Post
Well, granted, it looks nice...if you can run it. My box does not have the hardware to run G3 as intended, so I'm looking/staring at a "stipped-down Lambo", G3 runs in fallback, and that's ... not really that nice.
You like the way that gnome 3 looks? *blinks* Its not for me. Nice to hear that somebody likes it, even if I dont.
 
Old 06-03-2011, 09:54 AM   #14
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
Quote:
I wouldnt call that 'windowsish'. You could always rename 'menu' to 'start', that would be going in the right direction. :P

Its odd seeing the arch icon there, I'm used to the vanilla 'black rat over blue cross'.
Heh, I suppose so…I mostly think it looks "Windows-ish" because of the Aero-like window borders, and the fact that the panel is arranged much like the (classic) Windows taskbar. But hey, I likes it.

About the icon: mostly I just wanted to have something distinguishing, as opposed to the vanilla Xfce mouse logo. What better way to show off my "Arch pride" than to use the distro logo as the application menu icon?

Quote:
Xfce 4.X is what I use for systems that dont have a boatload of RAM, or have a poor video card (anything by intel, nVidia GF4 or earlier, ATI 8XXX or earlier).
Actually, I've read/heard that Intel's Sandy Bridge IGPs are somewhat on par with other entry-level discrete GPUs (e.g. NVIDIA GeForce 3xxM, etc.). I don't have a machine with a SB CPU, though, so I can't say for sure. :-\

Last edited by MrCode; 06-03-2011 at 09:57 AM.
 
Old 06-03-2011, 11:22 AM   #15
ButterflyMelissa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,766
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411Reputation: 411
Quote:
You like the way that gnome 3 looks? *blinks* Its not for me. Nice to hear that somebody likes it, even if I dont.
Well, only judging by the screenshots I saw so far...it does not run on my system, hence the "dissappointment"... but it's not going the way i want it to go. But, I'm not the type to let loose my full cruelty onto someone's efforts...

Quote:
Xfce 4.X is what I use for systems that dont have a boatload of RAM, or have a poor video card (anything by intel, nVidia GF4 or earlier, ATI 8XXX or earlier).
...both cases here, 1.5Gb ram and an Intel 915...go figure...

And "nice" - if you're into this kinda thing...

Last edited by ButterflyMelissa; 06-03-2011 at 11:24 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Xubuntu 11.04 Released With Xfce 4.8, Gmusicbrowser Default, New Artwork Screenshots LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-30-2011 10:50 AM
How to install xfce 4.6 at /opt/xfce? josealexandre Linux - General 2 03-01-2009 12:31 PM
XFce and Compiz : xfce doesn't manage the desktop naaman Linux - Desktop 0 07-16-2008 01:39 AM
XFCE Network ServersI use XFCE (sometimes) but I can not find my network folders on a holzster Ubuntu 0 10-24-2006 05:48 PM
Xfce problems with task bar and xfce-panel aeruzcar Linux - Software 4 06-26-2006 05:29 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop > Linux - Member Desktop Screenshots

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration