I want to create a linux that is designed to run on my machine
Linux - Laptop and NetbookHaving a problem installing or configuring Linux on your laptop? Need help running Linux on your netbook? This forum is for you. This forum is for any topics relating to Linux and either traditional laptops or netbooks (such as the Asus EEE PC, Everex CloudBook or MSI Wind).
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Quote:
I get a lot of complaints from people who are bogged down on OS X with "only" 4gb and need to upgrade to 8gb for decent performance.
----------------
wow, they must be using a lot of big apps at the same time.
not really
i can have one program running ad run out of the 8 gig i have
currently i am thinking of installing 32 gig of ram
NOW i do work with LARGE images
32 bit floating point and 16 bit singed images that can be ( w,l) 65536x32786 or 131072x65583
a image that is 12 to 36 gig in size
right now i use a large swap space on a different drive
--------------
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273 View Post
Linux is not for you if you aren't willing to do some work.
-----
why has this become a rule?
well Microsoft dose try VERY hard to support the "lowest common denominator"
the person that will NEVER!!!! try to "learn" anything
and the person that dose NOT WANT TO LEARN
the " point and click" people
Linux os's for the most part will never be FOR "point and click" people
-- canonical is trying for that --- but........
some to a lot of self improvement is needed for using a Linux or even Mac OS
To be clear, Windows has more driver problems than linux does. The last year or so has seen me having to install Windows 7 on machines sold with Windows 8, which you would thing would be straight forward process...WRONG! I've had situations where I had to track down all drivers individually, including the ethernet driver which had to be done on another computer then copied to a usb stick and installed from that on the machine I was working on. Pfft....I could have installed Linux on a dozen machines in the time it took to do that one Windows machine.
Ok, the things you basically need to know is:
What type of Video card you have.
What type of Network controller you have (including ethernet and wifi)
In most cases, ALSA will handle your sound card, right out of the box. Xorg has a Vesa Driver that will work for a plug-and-play type thing, allowing you to have video until you get the right video driver installed.
Now, unless you have some weird Broadcom wifi card, wifi should work too.
If someone were to ask what would be the best platform to build a distro, tailored to your needs. I would reply with much glee; Arch! That's what I use, and I wouldn't consider anything else. Arch gives you the tools to build a system that has everything you need, and not one thing more.
The only problem with Arch is that you really need a few years of experience, and understanding of Linux in general before you tackle an Arch install. There are a couple of install scripts out there, but without the know-how, you may not know how to use those either.
I think for the most part you shouldn't have any trouble with any of the popular distros. You may have to install proprietary drivers once you get the distro installed, but that's not by any means difficult.
If that's the case, consider getting a system with Ubuntu preinstalled, such as from System76 or ZaReason, or the Dell XPS.
Although, even then, you're not going to find the same tight, trouble-free integration that you will find with a Mac. As has already been stated, they control both the hardware and the software, so they have an advantage there. I use a Mac 9-10 hours a day, 5 days a week at work, and everything just works as it should, yes, but I still go home and use Slackware on my ThinkPad T61. Everything "just works" there, too, but I have complete control over my setup, and Slackware doesn't suffer from the "beta" feel of many Linux distros.
If that's the case, consider getting a system with Ubuntu preinstalled, such as from System76 or ZaReason, or the Dell XPS.
Although, even then, you're not going to find the same tight, trouble-free integration that you will find with a Mac. As has already been stated, they control both the hardware and the software, so they have an advantage there. I use a Mac 9-10 hours a day, 5 days a week at work, and everything just works as it should, yes, but I still go home and use Slackware on my ThinkPad T61. Everything "just works" there, too, but I have complete control over my setup, and Slackware doesn't suffer from the "beta" feel of many Linux distros.
Macs work as well as they do because they're high-end hardware. It's not fair to compare them to Linux or Windows. You can't buy a new mac for $399. But you can buy a PC for that much. If you spend $2500 on a PC, then you can compare it to a Mac.
I agree about Slackware. I use Arch for the same reason.
The opensource driveway is littered with great ideas that expected an army of developers to just jump at the idea with no compensation beyond community betterment. It rarely works if the guy or girl with the idea doesn't have the ability and motivation to do the brunt of the work themselves.
Macs work as well as they do because they're high-end hardware. It's not fair to compare them to Linux or Windows. You can't buy a new mac for $399. But you can buy a PC for that much. If you spend $2500 on a PC, then you can compare it to a Mac.
Completely agree with you, here. Just as an example, my wife last month lost her 1st generation iPhone, whilst out playing in the snow. Just a few days ago, a man and his two young sons came to our door, with said iPhone. It had been outdoors for a month, in snow and rain. They took it home, stuck it in a bag of rice to dry it out, recharged it, found our address on it. It STILL works, perfectly. I have been through about four Android phones in the same time period. Just holding an iPhone in one hand, and the average Android phone in the other, you can feel the difference in quality. iPhones are heavy, solid, well-built; most Android phones are light and cheap. That's not to say that there aren't well made Android phones, but they are the exception, rather than the rule.
Yup, it's the same with laptops/desktop hardware... there's good non-Apple stuff out there, but it's the exception. These guys make bad-ass hardware, but they are specific to my industry (print). Not unusual for these things to go for 10+ years without a hardware failure.
I would imagine most preinstalled Linux machines don't come with a disk or backup partition for reinstall? So, if you FUBAR it you'd be back to square one and if your a microcoughed, ma¢ even Linux:
Quote:
Originally Posted by John VV
... " point and click" ...
only person inevitably do you know how slow or FUBARed there computers get... it's like buying a car and never doing an oil change? Unlike oil changes where you have to at lest buy oil, putting it in and Linux is free to learn.
Last edited by jamison20000e; 03-20-2014 at 06:03 PM.
...
NOW i do work with LARGE images
32 bit floating point and 16 bit singed images that can be ( w,l) 65536x32786 or 131072x65583
a image that is 12 to 36 gig in size
right now i use a large swap space on a different drive
this is an example of a medium to large image
the D15 Earth Topographic data in simple cylindrical map projection
16 bit SINGED LSB format raw image
65536 x 32768 pixels ( width x height )
Yup, it's the same with laptops/desktop hardware... there's good non-Apple stuff out there, but it's the exception. These guys make bad-ass hardware, but they are specific to my industry (print). Not unusual for these things to go for 10+ years without a hardware failure.
The stuff on that link you shared is definately some bad ass stuff. I wish I could afford stuff like that. I do a lot of video encoding. It would be nice to be able to Encode videos really fast.
only person inevitably do you know how slow or FUBARed there computers get... it's like buying a car and never doing an oil change? Unlike oil changes where you have to at lest buy oil, putting it in and Linux is free to learn.
my EX ( this was a few years back ) had XP sp3 and 6 TOOLBARS in IE6
and 8 in firefox
with at least 100 "installers" for crapware on the DESKTOP
and was wondering why it was taking a long time to turn on
my EX ( this was a few years back ) had XP sp3 and 6 TOOLBARS in IE6
and 8 in firefox
with at least 100 "installers" for crapware on the DESKTOP
and was wondering why it was taking a long time to turn on
My god....If I had a dollar for every time I had to fix someones system for doing that...
lol...not to mention the 40+ "New Folders" on the desktop
I've been telling people for years: "don't ever put executables on the desktop. Windows (explorer) feels as though it has to cache all executable files it finds on the desktop. At least that's the way it used to be.
...and the stupid toolbars...I know exactly what you're talking about. I remember a while back I was trying to clean up my mother in law's computer. I opened IE, and the toolbars took up half the scree. I almost peed a little from laughing so hard
Probably a topic for a new tread unless you have a quick fix?
Quote:
Originally Posted by John VV
this is an example of a medium to large image
the D15 Earth Topographic data in simple cylindrical map projection
16 bit SINGED LSB format raw image
65536 x 32768 pixels ( width x height )
G-Drive has no file size limit
BUT
15 Gig is the free size
25 with google photos and g-drive
Whats a good way to view it should I install http://fwtools.maptools.org/ ? It's taking me longer than downloading it the Gimp almost views from the site put
Quote:
TIFF Image Message:
Warning:
The image you are loading has 16 bits per channel. GIMP can only handle 8 bit, so it will be converted for you. Information will be lost because of this conversion.
then for the .raw download GIMP importer for raw camera images won't load it at all and
NASA has a lot of cool big images too tho converted to load (but don't seem that HD here) in Firefox: http://petapixel.com/2013/06/04/nasa...ring-galaxies/
I saw on some show how they combine megapixels from cellphones can't find a link (probably not too unlike) and don't recall the staggering number of pixels the tech could create.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.