Quote:
Originally Posted by Arnulf
The nvidia GeForce GT210 is a very poor graphics card. It is nvidia's lowest end graphics card of the GeForce GT2xx series. A cheap used Ati graphics card e.g. a Radeon HD 5450 will give better performance with Linux and it is compatible to many elder hardware.
|
Using mine normally, I never would have guessed there was any significant difference. I bought both around the same time too long ago to remember for how much, but they had to have been in the USD$20-$30 range, new old stock. However:
Code:
# inxi -SCG
System:
Host: hp945 Kernel: 5.14.21-150500.53-default arch: x86_64 bits: 64
Desktop: KDE v: 3.5.10 Distro: openSUSE Leap 15.5
CPU:
Info: dual core model: Intel Core2 6600 bits: 64 type: MCP cache: L2: 4 MiB
Speed (MHz): avg: 1600 min/max: 1600/2400 cores: 1: 1600 2: 1600
Graphics:
Device-1: NVIDIA GT218 [GeForce 210] driver: nouveau v: kernel
chip-ID: 10de:0a65
Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.21.1.4 driver: X: loaded: modesetting
unloaded: fbdev,vesa dri: nouveau gpu: nouveau resolution: 1: 1680x1050~60Hz
2: 1920x1200~60Hz
API: OpenGL v: 3.3 Mesa 22.3.5 renderer: NVA8
# glmark2
=======================================================
glmark2 2021.12
=======================================================
OpenGL Information
GL_VENDOR: nouveau
GL_RENDERER: NVA8
GL_VERSION: 3.3 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 22.3.5
Surface Config: buf=32 r=8 g=8 b=8 a=8 depth=24 stencil=0 samples=0
Surface Size: 800x600 windowed
...
=======================================================
glmark2 Score: 166
#
Note I use the nouveau kernel driver, but not the nouveau display driver on my NVidia, while on my Radeon, I'm using the radeon display driver instead of modesetting.
Code:
# inxi -CGS
System:
Host: vizio Kernel: 5.14.21-150500.53-default arch: x86_64 bits: 64
Desktop: Trinity v: R14.1.0 Distro: openSUSE Leap 15.5
CPU:
Info: dual core model: Intel Core2 Duo E8400 bits: 64 type: MCP cache:
L2: 6 MiB
Speed (MHz): avg: 2830 min/max: N/A cores: 1: 2992 2: 2669
Graphics:
Device-1: AMD Cedar [Radeon HD 5000/6000/7350/8350 Series] driver: radeon ### HD5450
v: kernel chip-ID: 1002:68f9
Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.21.1.4 driver: X: loaded: radeon
unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa dri: r600 gpu: radeon
resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz
API: OpenGL v: 4.5 Mesa 22.3.5 renderer: AMD CEDAR (DRM 2.50.0 /
5.14.21-150500.53-default LLVM 15.0.7)
# glmark2
=======================================================
glmark2 2021.12
=======================================================
OpenGL Information
GL_VENDOR: X.Org
GL_RENDERER: AMD CEDAR (DRM 2.50.0 / 5.14.21-150500.53-default, LLVM 15.0.7)
GL_VERSION: 4.5 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 22.3.5
Surface Config: buf=32 r=8 g=8 b=8 a=8 depth=24 stencil=0 samples=0
Surface Size: 800x600 windowed
...
=======================================================
glmark2 Score: 798 (using radeon DDX; 619 using modesetting DIX)
#
798 / 166 = 4.807
Yikes! But, I wonder how much difference, if any, the slower CPU serving the 210 makes? 2.4 / 3.0 = 0.80. I can't readily swap them. The 5450 is short. The 210 is tall, and in a PC under a table under a printer, no small chore to work on.