LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


View Poll Results: Which Linux Architecture Do You Use?
Alpha 2 0.38%
ARM 83 15.69%
MIPS 3 0.57%
Power 1 0.19%
PowerPC 11 2.08%
SPARC 3 0.57%
x86_32 214 40.45%
x86_64 434 82.04%
Other 9 1.70%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 529. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-05-2013, 07:56 AM   #46
PrinceCruise
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /Universe/Earth/India/Pune
Distribution: Slackware64 -Current
Posts: 890

Rep: Reputation: 186Reputation: 186

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broker824 View Post
x86_32 and x86_64.
I will soon buy Raspberry Pi, and I install Slackware, Arch and Debian to separate SD cards.
Me too. Somewhere in December I'll be installing Slackware on an ARM board, hopefully.

Regards.
 
Old 09-05-2013, 09:35 AM   #47
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimBone View Post
Well I just received the email about this poll and I am already too late to vote. Here it is anyway:
I use both x86_64 and x86_32 cause I want more than one machine to mess with. I prefer 64 bit by a long shot.
Unlike the MCA polls, these polls do not have an end date.

--jeremy
 
Old 09-05-2013, 09:36 AM   #48
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,604

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103Reputation: 4103
Quote:
Originally Posted by syg00 View Post
... and my "Other" isn't even listed.
Out of curiosity, what is your "Other"?

--jeremy
 
Old 09-05-2013, 10:59 AM   #49
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfklinux View Post
but it is my understanding that the real purpose of developing 64 bit systems is to prepare for the expansion of addresses (IPv4 to IPv6.
No, that has nothing to do with the IPv4/IPv6 switch (network addresses). You can use larger memory arrays on 64 bit systems with less overhead on smaller memory arrays (>892MB), but additional to that x86_64 also has larger and more registers than x86, so that many programs will have a performance gain, but not all. On a PC with "normal" usage (browsing the web, playing music/videos, doing some office work) you won't see performance differences, but for some other tasks the performance increases are huge.
 
Old 09-05-2013, 01:46 PM   #50
crazypenguin
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Idaho
Distribution: Linux Mint, Manjaro, FreeBSD, Android
Posts: 99

Rep: Reputation: 11
On the first post I missed many Linux devices which I use everyday. So instead of editing the original post I will add them below.

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazypenguin View Post
I voted for x86_64, x86, and ARM. The break down is as follows.

5 Desktop (Daily users) PCs x86_64
1 Laptop x86_64
1 Netbook x86_64
3 Desktop Test PCs x86_64
4 Legacy PCs x86 (two of them probably should be scrapped out)
4 Android devices running ARM
1 Raspberry Pi embedded Linux ARM
Synology 213 ARM
Roku 3 ARM (Some of the older models used MIPS)
WD Live MIPS
Sony Bravia Blu Ray Player MIPS
Vizio Blu Ray Player MIPS
Chromecast MIPS?
AVerMedia Game Capture HD MIPS
Netgear Router WNDR4500-100NAS MIPS
Netgear Router WNR3500L MIPS
Zytel DSL Modem MIPS
Cisco Home Router MIPS
8 Trendnet Switches MIPS?
4 Security Cameras W/built in web server MIPS
HP Printer MIPS
Epson Printer MIPS?
 
Old 09-14-2013, 09:25 AM   #51
philipgr
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Boksburg, South Africa
Distribution: Linux Mint 18.1
Posts: 51

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Cool Which Linux Architecture Do You Use?

I have been using x86 in Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04. Recently I purchased a new PC with an Intel CI5 cpu and a Gigabyte motherboard. I installed Ubuntu 12.04 64bit. It is a lot faster than the 32bit version. I use Clementine and have found that the sound quality is much better than in the 32bit version. However I have some issues with it. I have installed the GNOME Classic desktop and have found that Alt+Tab does not work. My other issue is that it is stuck on 1024x768 screen resolution. It does not read the Intel graphics on the motherboard. I dual boot with Windows 7 Ultimate which reads the Intel graphics without any problems.
 
Old 09-14-2013, 09:43 AM   #52
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680

Rep: Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373
I have far fewer machines than a lot of people here at only two:
A desktop with a FX 8120 running Debian Sid 64 bit and Slackware 64 bit sometimes,
An EEEPC running Debian Sid 32 bit since it's a single-core Atom.

I hope to expand that with a Pi soon when time/money/everything else permits.

A friend made the move from 32 bit Ubuntu to 64 bit and found the performance increase staggering -- when I mentioned that the extra instructions alone could account for a lot of it he swore at me for not telling him sooner. The larger registers and addressable memory of AMD64 may not mean it's faster than i386 by default but the fact most i386 distros and programs are compiled for a limited instruction set mean if you've a 64 bit processor you ought to find a 64 bit OS faster.
 
Old 09-14-2013, 11:14 AM   #53
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US( + travel,) Earth&Mars (I wish,) END BORDER$!◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that work on freest-HW; has been KDE, CLI, Novena-SBC but open.. http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 4,888
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273 View Post
... Pi soon when time/money/everything ...
I guess I could see for someone with computers on a very tight budget (money\time\whatever) but the (entertainment\*) value vs coast is capacious. Most people already have the screen, speakers, mini-USB-cable (e.g.) WiFi-thumb-drive, etc but good portable ones can be cheap too, along with breadboards and doodads+++

Last edited by jamison20000e; 09-25-2013 at 06:40 AM.
 
Old 09-25-2013, 03:58 AM   #54
Ivan Tham
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2013
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Smile

No way there is only 1 android phone at home.
And there are many people using raspberry pi.
 
Old 09-25-2013, 08:17 AM   #55
starlyte
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: France, Languedoc-Roussillon (pre frontiere espagnol)
Distribution: Puppy Linux!
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
I have, in reality, PC's with 2 to 6 cores, 64 bits, but I've not yet found a flavor of Linux that I like in 64bits. I'm a Pupy Linux lover, and don't want to swap it for a blown up distro, but the 64bits Puppies are a bit limited. I'll be changing soon, but with a 32 bits option, an essential for me, as 64bits isn't totally adopted, as yet
I've also a Raspi, but it's not yet in action. I'll install Puppy on that too, as it's only around 100Mb for the distro complete

Last edited by starlyte; 09-25-2013 at 08:20 AM.
 
Old 09-25-2013, 08:34 AM   #56
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US( + travel,) Earth&Mars (I wish,) END BORDER$!◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that work on freest-HW; has been KDE, CLI, Novena-SBC but open.. http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 4,888
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567
Quote:
Originally Posted by starlyte View Post
...
Fatdg64 a derivative of Puppy Linux, at a whole whopping 200 and some megabytes.

Last edited by jamison20000e; 09-25-2013 at 08:38 AM.
 
Old 09-25-2013, 09:02 AM   #57
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by starlyte View Post
as 64bits isn't totally adopted, as yet
I am curious, what are you missing in 64 bit distros?
 
Old 09-25-2013, 09:06 AM   #58
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US( + travel,) Earth&Mars (I wish,) END BORDER$!◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that work on freest-HW; has been KDE, CLI, Novena-SBC but open.. http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 4,888
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567
maybe back in the day\less-apps http://unix.stackexchange.com/questi...use-a-64bit-os

only 32 if I have to

Last edited by jamison20000e; 09-25-2013 at 09:57 AM.
 
Old 09-25-2013, 09:50 AM   #59
nickname
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: NYC
Distribution: Crux 3.0
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I do have a x86_64 cpu but I prefer to use x86-32 distros. And I use ARM for my android smartphone.

Last edited by nickname; 09-25-2013 at 10:52 AM.
 
Old 09-25-2013, 12:29 PM   #60
PrinceCruise
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /Universe/Earth/India/Pune
Distribution: Slackware64 -Current
Posts: 890

Rep: Reputation: 186Reputation: 186
Even I have a 64-bit cpu since 4 years, however I've only used pure 32-bit Linux because this laptop supports only 4 GB of max. RAM. And I anyways found no compelling reason to use 64 bit OS with 3 GB of RAM it came with.

Regards.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how can i port a driver with a specific architecture into another architecture? the hope Linux - Hardware 4 03-23-2011 05:39 PM
what is 'architecture' in 'binary for an architecture'?multiple architecture support? wagaboy Linux - Newbie 2 07-10-2010 11:18 AM
Linux + architecture aeby Linux - Hardware 3 07-11-2007 05:36 AM
Linux OS Architecture daihard Linux - Software 3 11-03-2005 09:13 PM
A New Linux Architecture? Kdr Kane General 11 05-25-2005 01:52 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration