Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I hardly know the difference among them. I once had computer whose mother board had an audio glitch. Some kernels sidestepped that issue, most did not. But the problem was the mother board. Doing research, I found that even Windows had a problem with it. Now I have a Zareason computer. For over 3 years, every Linux kernel sails perfectly and equally well.
My first LINUX install was called “Slackware”. It was the hardest one I’ve ever had to install. I understood “nothing” about the install, and finally was able to get it up and running. Later, while trying to locate a version of RedHat, I was sent a CD for SuSE LINUX by mistake. I fell in love with this release!
Today, OpenSuSE is still by far the easiest release to manage. Even the admin can be done by CLI (command line) using a menu system ... much faster and easier. I still prefer to learn things via commands, so I can put them into shell scripts, so LINUX Mint has been my favorite release of choice to date, and I am currently trying to decide what to switch to ... OpenSuSE, or stay with LINUX Mint. I like Ubuntu, but I had that Unity thing and spend half of my time trying to get rid of it and go back to their earlier layout used in the releases near 10.x
The one thing I do like is the commonality between Ubuntu, LINUX Mint, etc. where your install commands are the same. THis makes the learning curve MUCH easier!
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,634
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rAllcorn
...I am currently trying to decide what to switch to ... OpenSuSE, or stay with LINUX Mint.
...
I'd suggest you might want to try tumbleweed, then. It is really polished and not at all prone to breaking down even though it is close to cutting edge .
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,634
Rep:
If this is related to my last post -- tumbleweed always gets the latest kernel with the actual SUSE patches. Mine is something like 4.20.6-1 I belive. Updated the day before yesterday.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
No JZL240I-U, it wasn't just related to your last post. There's been a number of posts before that, that don't say much if anything about the actual kernel version, but just talk about specific distro's, rather than the actual kernel versions involved. I wasn't trying to be rude to anyone, it was just like "well if this thread is supposed to be about which kernel version people liked, then it hardly seems like it is", that's all. It wasn't aimed at anyone in particular, just a general comment.
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,634
Rep:
I see. Oh, and no offense taken. As to the kernel Version(s), I think the developers generally and steadily improve the kernel. That's one of the reasons I use tumbleweed which is a well tested quasi rolling release with always the latest kernel. Especially handy for notebooks and energy saving features.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
The Linux kernel is probably one of the few things I could honestly say something like "I've never installed a Linux kernel version that I've found or experienced any major bugs in/with" about. In all honestly, I'm struggling to think of even just one version of it that I've even found any minor or slightly annoying bugs/flaws in. They do a really good job with keeping it very stable and reliable, I must say.
To answer this question, you need to go through all versions of the kernel starting from 1.0 - 5.2. when I do, I can answer. I think it will happen soon
4.13.0-45. From all of the other kernels I tried, this is the only one that works most reliable and stable without raping my CPU and raising its temperature.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.