Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
My problem is that I have 2 domain controllers/DNS servers and when one goes down, clients hang on to the DNS cache for 1 day (by default on Windows) so they don't automatically find the other DNS server. I was able to find this setting on Windows machines in the registry and change it to a lower value, but i also have Linux servers using these for DNS. Does anyone know how I can make these changes on Red Hat Linux?
timeout:n
sets the amount of time the resolver will wait for a
response from a remote name server before retrying the
query via a different name server. Measured in seconds,
the default is RES_TIMEOUT (currently 5, see <resolv.h>).
24 hours seems extremely long. If you had one DNS server down would you really want to wait a whole day before another DNS server responded?
I suspect you're confusing TTL (time to live) settings with client side lookup. The client uses what is called a stub resolver. DNS servers often cache records as well. The TTL deals with how long to cache a record before asking again. Windows clients (stub resolvers) do cache entries however, UNIX/LINUX clients don't typically cache - they always ask the question of the name server which itself might have cached the answer.
So the TTL deals with how long to cache an answer once you've gotten it.
The timeout I mentioned in my prior response deals with how long to wait until you ask a different server which isn't the same thing.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.