LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Linux From Scratch
User Name
Password
Linux From Scratch This Forum is for the discussion of LFS.
LFS is a project that provides you with the steps necessary to build your own custom Linux system.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-22-2019, 10:34 AM   #16
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,680

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492

Better safe than sorry! Does your system boot?
 
Old 08-22-2019, 11:32 AM   #17
rabidlinux
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2017
Location: Wild West
Distribution: Arch,Tumbleweed,BLFS 9.0
Posts: 227

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Boots fine
 
Old 08-25-2019, 11:46 PM   #18
Luridis
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Texas
Distribution: LFS 9.0 Custom, Merged Usr, Linux 4.19.x
Posts: 616

Rep: Reputation: 167Reputation: 167
Is it ready? Look at the screenshot... My only complaint is that PaleMoon won't build with either GCC-9.2.0 or glibc-2.30, dunno which one is causing the issue.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	rc0.png
Views:	41
Size:	181.0 KB
ID:	31212  

Last edited by Luridis; 08-25-2019 at 11:49 PM.
 
Old 08-26-2019, 05:18 AM   #19
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,680

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luridis View Post
Is it ready? Look at the screenshot... My only complaint is that PaleMoon won't build with either GCC-9.2.0 or glibc-2.30, dunno which one is causing the issue.
It's gcc. Palemoon won't build with any recent gcc because some of its headers contain syntax that isn't valid any more. gcc-6 should work.

Last edited by hazel; 08-26-2019 at 05:19 AM.
 
Old 08-28-2019, 02:58 PM   #20
bryan_S
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Location: N. Florida
Distribution: Linux-from-Scratch
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luridis View Post
Is it ready? Look at the screenshot... My only complaint is that PaleMoon won't build with either GCC-9.2.0 or glibc-2.30, dunno which one is causing the issue.
FWIW, Firefox 60.8.0 esr will not build with glibc-2.30. I'm in the process of rolling back to to glibc-2.29. The issue is the same as with the current Seamonkey browser - there is a solution in the book for that and i tried to apply it to firefox esr but it didn't work.

I won't be making a fresh build of 9.0 this time. I've been rolling along with the SVN version and it works great. I'm current on just about everything but glibc. I build a lot of non-lfs items for my desktop and no telling how many things the new glibc will break. I'm not gonna risk it.
 
Old 08-30-2019, 09:37 AM   #21
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,680

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492
Yup, boots!

I just saw a blfs-dev post that blfs-9.0-rc1 will be released on Sunday, so I will continue after that. Actually, I'm surprised they managed to freeze it; there's been a huge amount of problems on that list.
 
Old 08-30-2019, 10:45 PM   #22
Luridis
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Texas
Distribution: LFS 9.0 Custom, Merged Usr, Linux 4.19.x
Posts: 616

Rep: Reputation: 167Reputation: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
It's gcc. Palemoon won't build with any recent gcc because some of its headers contain syntax that isn't valid any more. gcc-6 should work.
The new release, 28.7.0 will build with GCC-9.2.0 if you add some CFLAGS to the build command. As a matter of fact, I'm posting this from that build.

Code:
(Assuming Bash...)
CFLAGS+=" -w -fpermissive" CXXFLAGS+=" -w -fpermissive" ./mach build
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-01-2019, 03:53 PM   #23
rabidlinux
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2017
Location: Wild West
Distribution: Arch,Tumbleweed,BLFS 9.0
Posts: 227

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Build blfs 9.0 stable with 9.0 rc base system alrady done ??

Hi All,
I finished the blfs 9.0 rc edition with only a couple of problems. Rustc gave me some trouble
when installing librsvg for abiword.Never could get it to install. Now that the stable version is out today I will do it.
Just wondering if my 9.0 rc-1 stable lfs is good enough or should I rebuild lfs 9.0 stable?
Any thoughts?
thanks

Last edited by rabidlinux; 09-01-2019 at 03:56 PM.
 
Old 09-01-2019, 04:04 PM   #24
spiky0011
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: PLANET-SPIKE
Distribution: /LFS/Debian
Posts: 2,511
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 412Reputation: 412Reputation: 412Reputation: 412Reputation: 412
You can check "change log" to see whats changed
 
Old 09-02-2019, 05:33 AM   #25
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,680

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492
When I build with a release candidate, I don't rebuild. In my experience there's no need. The only hitches seem to be minor ones.

PS: Release 9.0 of both LFS and BLFS just announced on the mailing list.

Last edited by hazel; 09-02-2019 at 05:35 AM. Reason: Postscript added
 
Old 09-02-2019, 04:24 PM   #26
rabidlinux
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2017
Location: Wild West
Distribution: Arch,Tumbleweed,BLFS 9.0
Posts: 227

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thanks to ALL
 
Old 09-05-2019, 06:08 AM   #27
rabidlinux
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2017
Location: Wild West
Distribution: Arch,Tumbleweed,BLFS 9.0
Posts: 227

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Everything has installed fine and even some of my usually problem programs worked good.
Firefox, Thunderbird and the dreaded rustc worked perfect. Before I ran into problems with rustc and librsvg for Abiword with 9.0 rc-1. Will be working on Media players and sound next.
Good luck to all
 
Old 09-08-2019, 03:36 AM   #28
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,680

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492Reputation: 4492
I'm ploughing through BLFS 9.0 and feeling increasingly unhappy about it. There seem to be all kinds of extra dependencies compared with earlier versions. It used to be so easy to craft a system that just contained what I wanted. It was fun, and now increasingly it isn't fun at all, it's frustrating. I think I am getting too old for this lark.
 
Old 09-08-2019, 07:10 AM   #29
rabidlinux
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2017
Location: Wild West
Distribution: Arch,Tumbleweed,BLFS 9.0
Posts: 227

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I can understand that. After 8.3 I thought it would be easier with what I learned. 8.4 gave me a hard time and 9.0 is acting strange
with sound.
 
Old 09-08-2019, 09:44 AM   #30
derguteweka
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Distribution: BLFS
Posts: 74

Rep: Reputation: 21
Moin,

Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
I'm ploughing through BLFS 9.0 and feeling increasingly unhappy about it. There seem to be all kinds of extra dependencies compared with earlier versions. It used to be so easy to craft a system that just contained what I wanted. It was fun, and now increasingly it isn't fun at all, it's frustrating. I think I am getting too old for this lark.
Yeah, this is also my experience after a couple of years of LFS/BLFS (starting with LFS-3.3). But seems there is no way back.
It's not only full-bloat-software like KDE, which needs (for my taste) absolutely unnecessary things like PAM or pulseaudio, but also small, tiny things like e.g. ntp start to need couples of perl modules, where i'd suspect, that a link against openssl should be sufficient.

But to be a little bit positive: This makes building a BLFS much more easier. You do not have to think any longer: Do i need this package? No, it's almost sure, that _every_ package will be needed ;-)

Cheers
WK
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hey Hey Hey nathank33 LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 2 09-07-2013 08:10 PM
hey hey hey SteveV LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 5 07-19-2013 03:13 AM
LXer: XBMC 11 Eden RC1 has been released! PPA UBUNTU LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-29-2012 08:01 PM
Hey, hey, hey! theBowler LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 1 02-29-2012 02:33 AM
Linux 3.0-rc1 has been released! Didier Spaier Slackware 15 05-31-2011 07:42 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Linux From Scratch

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration