LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-07-2002, 09:15 PM   #31
linuxfreak
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0

Microsoft at least openly admit they want you to pay for their products, but if you try to find information about how to acquire Suse you just get a load of bullshit right in your face. They don't say "you have to pay for it", instead they say "we don't offer ISO files online". Who are they kidding???

While MicroSoft build their products on mostly their own code, all Suse does is redistributing a bunch of free open source software with a price tag. Not because they don't have time or resources to offer ISO files, but because they refuse to let anyone get their distro without paying for it, and would sue anyone's ass for doing so just like Microsoft would for their XP.

I really hope Suse is not the future of Linux, cause then the future of Linux looks pretty bleach. They should look at RedHat and Mandrake, which make profit not on forcing people to pay for their distros, but on voluntary donations, technical support etc. while still offering their products for sale the regular way for those who prefer boxed versions with manuals etc...
 
Old 05-08-2002, 03:27 AM   #32
ronss
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: phoenix,az
Distribution: red hat linux enterprise-centos
Posts: 766

Rep: Reputation: 31
houdy- i get the drift. linux was suppose to be free, open source, not sure if it will continue to free, well, debian is one that i can think of that will always be free i believe due to the volunteer thing. mandrake is in financial troubles at the moment, believe they will survive. i really like mandrake, but my mouse doesn,t work to well with it.

i have just upgraded to red hat 7.3 from 7.2 with iso download, it was free.

i quess i don,t mind paying suse $39 for the personal, i always get the professional though. still, you got to agree that $39 is better than paying $150-$200 that micro$oft wants for a complete system.with the $79 i paid for the proffesion, though i am ticked i didn,t buy it from amazon for $64, suse will continue to offet a quality product.

it,s nice to get stuff free, iso,s,and it was suppose to be that way with linux, guess this is the changing of times.

Last edited by ronss; 05-08-2002 at 03:32 AM.
 
Old 05-08-2002, 05:51 AM   #33
sapilas
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Greece
Distribution: the best !
Posts: 176

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
well the thing with suse 8 is you pay £48 delivery home of prof edition. AND you have all the available software that you can possible use. No need to reconnect and download extra software.

While with windows you pay extra for the OS, extra for office packages extra for photoshop...... EXTRA EXTRA... and then you are out of money

 
Old 05-08-2002, 08:46 AM   #34
CARTMAN
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Turkiye
Distribution: Pardus
Posts: 147

Rep: Reputation: 16
You can sell LinuX as far as you give the *complete* source code with it. It doesnt conflict with GPL at all.
 
Old 05-08-2002, 08:58 AM   #35
ronss
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: phoenix,az
Distribution: red hat linux enterprise-centos
Posts: 766

Rep: Reputation: 31
interesting, did not know that.one thing if for sure, my 3 computers and all the software i have has put me in the poor house!!i don,t tell people how much i have spent on my unsatisfied hobby with computers.
 
Old 05-09-2002, 12:58 PM   #36
crashmeister
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541

Rep: Reputation: 47
I did read that Suse doesn't include things like make and gcc in the defaultinstall with 8.0
Is that really the case?
 
Old 05-09-2002, 01:53 PM   #37
sapilas
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Greece
Distribution: the best !
Posts: 176

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
----
I did read that Suse doesn't include things like make and gcc in the defaultinstall with 8.0
Is that really the case?
----

crazy people sometimees say crazy stuff....

I don't remember.. I installed Suse twice. First time I spend 2 minutes in the packages and second time I spend 20 mins.

both times I had gcc and make installed..

It depends I you select compact installation you get what you deserve...

However if you have any problem you just
~# YaST2
and you select additional software you might wanna install...

(insert the CD )
 
Old 05-09-2002, 02:38 PM   #38
crashmeister
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541

Rep: Reputation: 47
Yast2,well - that's the other point that keeps me from upgrading to 8.0. Had nothing but trouble with it with 7.3
 
Old 05-09-2002, 02:47 PM   #39
sapilas
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Greece
Distribution: the best !
Posts: 176

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
YaSt2

I used it many time until now in suse8.

to install aviplay, emu-tools,and more
unistall vmware..

It works fine (like windows add remove programs)

TRUST IN
 
Old 05-10-2002, 01:10 PM   #40
linuxfreak
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Got one question for you all...

Is there anything in the Suse license prohibiting the purchaser to install one single legally bought copy on an unlimited number of computers, one's own as well as those of friends etc?

I mean, for Windows it's very clear that it's a personal single user license and that you would have to buy a group license in order to install Windows on all computers in a network....

Really want to know
 
Old 05-10-2002, 01:15 PM   #41
rshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Perry, Iowa
Distribution: Mepis , Debian
Posts: 2,692

Rep: Reputation: 45
you can install it on 1 or 1000.
 
Old 05-13-2002, 07:21 AM   #42
sapilas
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Greece
Distribution: the best !
Posts: 176

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
some day I hope that day never come......

we will have to pay for linux too....

Then I will install DOS ver 6 .... again..
 
Old 06-13-2002, 08:38 PM   #43
MarcoSV
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: San Salvador
Distribution: None yet
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hi everyone. I'm a newbie to Linux.
I have read all messages posted here. I have a problem installing the downloadable SuSE 8.0 Version.

I downloaded the 3GB plus approx. suse 8.0 to harddisk, and already burned the Boot ISO to start installation.
I have 2 Partitions, one NTFS, one FAT32 and there is an Unlocated space ready for SuSE =)
I choose installing from Harddisk, so I specify the hda2 partition (FAT32), and the whole path /suse/i386/8.0.
Installation starts then it stops displaying a message that hda2 could not be mounted!
I drives me crazy! I don't have another PC so I can try SMB... so anyone can advise me on how to do so correctly???
I have read that no SuSE ISO images are available for download. I guess the majority of files must be the same and on the CD's distro.
Is there a possibility to get a text file with the List of the right structure to put back together files and burn them to a CD so you can install from CD instead of the Harddisk way???
SuSE ISO are illegal, but... if you downloaded all files from ftp.suse.com.. how can you put them into a CD so they work fine???
I'd appreciate any help. I've tried before Mandrake 8.2. 3 ISO's download and the job was done.
Thank you guys.

Marco
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
hello from a new member! jcorominas LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 1 06-07-2005 12:30 PM
Yet Another New Member EngineerJoe LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 1 03-18-2005 09:45 PM
LQ member progress status from member to senior member............. emailssent LQ Suggestions & Feedback 3 10-11-2004 01:31 PM
SuSE 9.0 and Slackware 9.1, Let's make SuSE fast as Slack vdogvictor Linux - General 2 06-19-2004 03:54 PM
SuSE 9.0 member of MS Domain? BoonZie Linux - Networking 1 02-06-2004 02:30 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration