Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Ubuntu - Fedora - or whatever works or gets handed to me.
Posts: 119
Rep:
thats bull$shit , i have my suse 8.2 runnig with the last nvidia dirvers ok!
geforce2 mx . if its about being free of course you cant beat other distros since you gotta pay for suse, i got myself a copy Po)
I have used both; my recommendation is to go for Suse. There are many sofware missing from Red Hat, plus you have to do many configurations.
If what you're getting is the box, Suse will come with plugins (java/flash) already configured with Konqueror, Mozilla and OpenOffice. There are more software with Suse than Red Hat; like K3b, Kopete, Knights, Grip, Xine, development (basic/advanced) tools and etc. Plus, nearly most those applications work out of the box without further setups.
I have yet to encounter freezes, lockups and crashes with Suse (regarding X). The case is different with Red Hat; it lacks Suse's rock-solid X functionality and stability. Suse has a centralized configurator; Yast2. Say you want to add entries into grub/lilo; Yast2 will do it with few clicks. Plus, it configures nearly all tasks regarding hardware and software (including installing rpm files).
Originally posted by Anubis thats bull$shit , i have my suse 8.2 runnig with the last nvidia dirvers ok!
geforce2 mx . if its about being free of course you cant beat other distros since you gotta pay for suse, i got myself a copy Po)
Did you compile from source or run nvidia's installer?
i agree with the above posts, red hat has software missing that suse 8.2 will have installed. you can download the drivers from nvidia for linux systems, i have done it and installed it on suse 8.2. i have used suse 8.2 and red hat 9, and suse 8.2 ends up on my desktop. red hat looks great, but a couple of things bother me with red hat. they have not made up there minds if they are going to make a distor for the desktop or not, though they are into the server market for sure. second- multi-media software missing, though you can install it, a newbe probably could not do it. and 3rd, i don,t get there entitlement thing, i switch ed form one computer to the other, and i cannot use the online update because of the entitlements, it,s so confusing .
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.