if you could make your own distro, what would you put in it??
Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: What feature improvements will bring more newbies to Linux?
UI with levels of customizability (newbie, moderate, advanced)
2
18.18%
Package search and install management (like Ximian Red Carpet)
1
9.09%
Better automation and improvements to the initial Installer
4
36.36%
More GUI-based / point and click style applications
Distribution: Trying to get GENTOO 2004.2 INSTALLED... Weeeee!!!!
Posts: 67
Rep:
if you could make your own distro, what would you put in it??
if you were building a new distribution - what features, programs, or innovations would you include? remember, it has to be free to download and distribute, so you can't include commercial/proprietary software - but free demos are ok!
Brainfood:
-Installer Features
-Bootloader
-Data Recovery Tools
-Filesystems
-Libraries
-Standard Packages:
- - Internet: Web Browsers, Email, IRC, ICU, Instant Message,FTP,HTTP,Web Development
- - Desktop Environment / Window Manager Combos
- - Login Manager
- - Servers and Daemons
- - Office, Graphics, Multimedia, File-Sharing
- - Emulators, Games (NO roms together w/emulators), Game-creation
A SECURE management module should be used via shttp with user/group permissions. It would be nice to set up a server with which a local admin user(s) could manage whatever level thay are allowed. Kinda like Netware...
i would make a test at the beginning of the install, if you pass it, the install procedes, if you fail, it prompts you to go to linuxquestions.org to learn more about linux.
It should prompt you for domain, shares, login script, users etc during the install and set it up automajically. It should have tick boxes for installing an e-mail server, ftp server, web server, fax server, proxy server and IP Masqing.
It should have web browser based GUI administration, strong security and automatic updates. On the CD would be a ssh freeware client that you use to connect to the server if you still wanted to do any config manually or learn more about linux.
The admin utility should automatically create back up files of any config changes you made. And there should be a tool similar to 'System Restore' in WinME that you could take any changes you made back to any point, in case you stuffed something up.
It would take over the market for servers for small to medium size businesses.
One of my mates had to put in an NT server at his work because he didn't know enough about linux to install a samba server. He knows linux/samba is better but doesn't have the time to learn it. If he had a CD that was a purpose built samba distro, that would have been a different story.
Mine would have something that would kind of convert source code. I do not know how to say it, but it would be like taking perl source code, and putting it through a program that would turn it into assembly code. It would also be called "Version 1"... It just sounds so...COOOOL!!!! Hee Hee! I'm so happy! Oh, yeah, it would be as powerful as red hat, and as easy as mandrake! Everything would be GPL, so that it could grow and be huge!
*****Colonel Panic*****
"Good programmers know what to write. Excellent programmers know what to rewrite"
--Eric S. Raymond
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.