LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-31-2003, 04:07 PM   #1
esteeven
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Bristol UK
Distribution: Arch Slackware Ubuntu
Posts: 1,082

Rep: Reputation: 52
Distro version suitability for different box specifications


I'm sure that the answer to this should be blindingly obvious but....*it's not to me* so....
I've been reasonably successful loading SuSe 7.3, 8.0 and 8.2 on a variety of boxes over the last couple of years. I've upgraded my distro out of curiosity and tend to use the latest version on installs - I now have 7 SuSe boxes at home and work. They mainly run 8.2 - except where I had problems with two TFT monitors and 8.0 seemed to load more smoothly.
I will continue to load 8.2 as a first choice (yes yes yes - one day I'll try Slack and Mandrake and Debian and Gentoo :-))- unless I am convinced otherwise. Is there any reason that I should install early versions of a distro if I am converting an older box to Linux use? I currently have a K2 333 (?) with 96mb and I want to use it as a web server for a simple site (and perhaps a mailserver) - do I need to try to select a distro version that matches the age of the box or do distros always cater to "the past" ? I'm looking to set up another box of similar specs as a simple web-browser cum email box.
I ask this question because I've been forced to touch with XP lately and I got to wondering how I would deal with this setup if I was using W$. I'm sure I could dig out a copy of W95!!
Cheers
Stephen
 
Old 08-31-2003, 11:14 PM   #2
Greyweather
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu 4.10
Posts: 311

Rep: Reputation: 30
"Is there any reason that I should install early versions of a distro if I am converting an older box to Linux use?"

Well, in the case of SuSE, 8.2 and 8.1 are set up to be used with i586 or higher processor architectures IIRC. So if you want to install SuSE on a system that uses i486 or lower, you'd want to use 8.0 or older.
 
Old 09-01-2003, 04:50 AM   #3
hpfandler
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Le Noirmont - Switzerland
Distribution: RedHat, Knoppix, Debian
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Re: Distro version suitability for different box specifications

Quote:
Originally posted by esteeven
Is there any reason that I should install early versions of a distro if I am converting an older box to Linux use?
just one word:
NEVER touch a running system ! If you have a good distro and you are happy with it - why use a new one with different settings/setups ?
In the heat of battle, I prefer to deal with as little differences as possible, when administering my systems. The variety of versions present on the systems I'm responsible for, increases the pain when time is come to close some open doors.
BTW older boxes run fine with older software, but not necessarily with newer one.
 
Old 09-01-2003, 12:42 PM   #4
esteeven
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Bristol UK
Distribution: Arch Slackware Ubuntu
Posts: 1,082

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
So on the AMD K2-266 that I want to use as a webserver, would I be better off with Suse 8.0 or 7.3? I seem to be having problems with 8.0 with the graphic/monitor setup.
 
Old 09-01-2003, 08:54 PM   #5
contrasutra
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: New Jersey
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 1,445

Rep: Reputation: 47
Id run Slackware or Debian. They are much lighter, and more suited for servers, especially on older systems.

You could run the latest version of those distros on that K6.
 
Old 09-02-2003, 03:05 AM   #6
esteeven
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Bristol UK
Distribution: Arch Slackware Ubuntu
Posts: 1,082

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Just one more question - I'll be ssh -ing into the server. I still need to use graphical tools eg webmin for admin. Does X have to be on the server to ssh into webmin? Currently, I ssh between several boxes and they all have the X environment. If webmin is installed on the server, can I do without X and use X on the ssh client? I hope I've expressed that clearly :-)
 
Old 09-02-2003, 02:40 PM   #7
esteeven
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Bristol UK
Distribution: Arch Slackware Ubuntu
Posts: 1,082

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
No - I don't need X for webmin. Webmin is accessed through a browser. Webin is therefore some kind of server. Therefore I can address set up issues and access webmin without X.
Wow.
I think I've finally answered one of my own questions.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
YUM and .hdr ... does anyone know the specifications? _UnPrEdictAbLe_ Programming 0 08-05-2005 07:31 PM
How to check system specifications? Niceman2005 Linux - Newbie 5 04-25-2005 04:21 AM
command which provides the specifications of my PC kpachopoulos Linux - General 3 11-03-2004 05:31 PM
Getting hardware specifications Bill Cosby Linux - Hardware 2 09-01-2004 01:53 PM
is suse in the box the same as the downloaded version? vincer Linux - Distributions 5 07-16-2004 03:33 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration