LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-04-2004, 01:59 PM   #1
r3dhatter
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian (testing)
Posts: 210

Rep: Reputation: 30
Debian and Slackware


I tried debian and I really like it. I have also tried some main stream like SuSE and Fedora. SuSE was kind of slow and bloated. Fedora was buggy and Mandrake is probably like SuSE.

So, I narrowed my options: Debian, Mepis, Slackware, maybe gentoo but probably not. (don't want to wait long to install stuff)

Now the reason I liked debian and want to change is:
If you don't apt-get dist-upgrade for a month, then you get all kinds of dependency problems because it upgrades out of order and it's a pain to fix.

Does Mepis, slackware, or gentoo have this problem?

Can someone suggest a way to fix it so I can stick to Debian. Better hardware support would be nice too.
 
Old 09-04-2004, 08:38 PM   #2
Linux.tar.gz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Paris
Distribution: Slackware forever.
Posts: 2,534

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
I don't know what is a problem with a Slackware.
 
Old 09-06-2004, 08:12 AM   #3
elluva
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Belguim, Ostend and Ghent
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 600

Rep: Reputation: 30
Slackware does not have this problem, 'cause it just hasn't apt-get like package system. Ok, you do have things like swaret, but it isn't very healthy for your slack system...

Although slackware doesn't have such a system, you don't have much dep-probs. That is because slack installs default a lot of libs, this way compiling is easy and you have fewer probs w/binary packs.

I know you are probably taking slack off your list after you read this, but you should really give it a chance. Slack installs and configures like a breez, it is as light or bloated as YOU want it to be. Really give it a chance and you won't regret it!
 
Old 09-08-2004, 01:14 PM   #4
insyte
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Slackware Current
Posts: 308

Rep: Reputation: 30
Yup I agree with that.

Although in slack you manage your own dependencies, which is not really hard, once you get used to it.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware vs. Debian Garibaldi3489 Linux - Distributions 25 03-20-2005 09:19 AM
Slackware 8.1 or Debian dannyflounders Linux - Distributions 2 07-27-2003 01:53 PM
Debian or Slackware BittaBrotha Linux - Laptop and Netbook 3 07-26-2003 12:14 PM
Slackware over Debian? naflan Slackware 17 07-06-2003 12:13 PM
Debian or Slackware? Dion Linux - Distributions 12 02-25-2003 07:19 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration