LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2005, 07:23 PM   #1
qualx2003
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Davison, Michigan
Distribution: Redhat 9 & Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question A distribution for a slowwww computer


I just got a old computer from a family member, its a old compaq with a riser board in it. Very old. Its a 333mhz p2, with 90mb ram. Hard drive is around 6gb. It already has mandrake 10 and XP on it, but both run very slowly. I was going to put Windows 2000, or NT 4 on it, but the thing is too slow to make any real good use out of it.

So I want to put some other distribution on it. What would run on it relatively well? I'd like something somewhat newbie/user friendly. I know a little bit, but not enough. I can't boot from CD rom, so it'll need a boot disk.

Thanks.
 
Old 02-28-2005, 07:39 PM   #2
RodimusProblem
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Knoppix 3.6
Posts: 135

Rep: Reputation: 15
Feather Linux. It's got a boot disk too.

Anything with Fluxbox or XFCE or another lightweight windowmanager should be an option (even Mandrake).

One of the computers I manage has only 64 MB of RAM and can run Feather pretty well.
 
Old 02-28-2005, 07:54 PM   #3
qualx2003
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Davison, Michigan
Distribution: Redhat 9 & Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I'll look into that. I was thinking about Redhat 7.3, or 8.0. 8.0 doesn't need alot of resources, I think the minimal requirements were just under what I have.
 
Old 02-28-2005, 07:56 PM   #4
qualx2003
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Davison, Michigan
Distribution: Redhat 9 & Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Feather linux is a live CD, do they have a version that can be installed to the harddrive?
 
Old 02-28-2005, 08:23 PM   #5
wapcaplet
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,018

Rep: Reputation: 48
I got Debian running on a 350mhz w/ 128MB RAM using XFCE. Looks nice and is quite responsive.
 
Old 02-28-2005, 08:27 PM   #6
RodimusProblem
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Knoppix 3.6
Posts: 135

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Feather linux is a live CD, do they have a version that can be installed to the harddrive?
There's a command in one of the menus that installs it to the hard drive.
 
Old 02-28-2005, 09:06 PM   #7
qualx2003
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Davison, Michigan
Distribution: Redhat 9 & Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by wapcaplet
I got Debian running on a 350mhz w/ 128MB RAM using XFCE. Looks nice and is quite responsive.
What version of debian?
 
Old 02-28-2005, 09:07 PM   #8
qualx2003
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Davison, Michigan
Distribution: Redhat 9 & Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by RodimusProblem
There's a command in one of the menus that installs it to the hard drive.
Oh ok, I'll give it a try. Thanks!
 
Old 02-28-2005, 11:18 PM   #9
jmajor
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 55
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 17
I had gentoo running on a Pentium 200 128MRam 9Gdisk untill I trashed the hard drive last night.
The install took a while (days) but it worked reasonably well for what it is.
 
Old 02-28-2005, 11:22 PM   #10
qualx2003
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Davison, Michigan
Distribution: Redhat 9 & Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I've tried gentoo before, I need something quick and simple to install.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 12:02 AM   #11
qualx2003
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Davison, Michigan
Distribution: Redhat 9 & Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I'm installing redhat 9, with a minimal amount of packages, and I'll see how that does, I'll probably just install a differnet windows manager. For now, I'll have gnome.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 12:19 AM   #12
RodimusProblem
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Knoppix 3.6
Posts: 135

Rep: Reputation: 15
Good luck: I almost had Red Hat 9 working on my mother's computer (64 MB RAM).

A 90 MB RAM computer should do somewhat better.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 01:25 AM   #13
qualx2003
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Davison, Michigan
Distribution: Redhat 9 & Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
It runs. It's not the fastest, but it works. It's alot faster than XP and mandrake. I'm sure with a lighter windows manager it will run better.
 
Old 03-03-2005, 09:19 PM   #14
cavalier
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Distribution: Slack 12, tweaked just so (though I'm also a fan of Ubuntu)
Posts: 198
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 30
Re: A distribution for a slowwww computer

Quote:
Originally posted by qualx2003
I just got a old computer from a family member, its a old compaq with a riser board in it. Very old. Its a 333mhz p2, with 90mb ram. Hard drive is around 6gb. It already has mandrake 10 and XP on it, but both run very slowly. I was going to put Windows 2000, or NT 4 on it, but the thing is too slow to make any real good use out of it.

So I want to put some other distribution on it. What would run on it relatively well? I'd like something somewhat newbie/user friendly. I know a little bit, but not enough. I can't boot from CD rom, so it'll need a boot disk.
I have no idea about it's ability to be loaded without a bootable CD, but Damn Small Linux (DSL) is what my friend is using on a whole host of P166 machines with either 64 or 96 megs of RAM and 3 GB hard drives.
 
Old 03-03-2005, 09:55 PM   #15
JSpired
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Slackware, Suse 9.2
Posts: 565

Rep: Reputation: 30
Vector Linux is also good on older hardware.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbie needs help choosing the best distribution for an old computer g-string 3 Linux - Distributions 29 07-31-2006 03:19 PM
Quake 3 Demo Slowwww JUDOLIZARD Linux - Games 3 11-14-2005 04:46 AM
Linux distribution on a slow computer? blackman890 Linux - Distributions 28 06-03-2005 03:10 PM
distribution for old, slow computer p1800 Linux - Newbie 20 04-19-2005 09:42 PM
multimedia distribution to make a hi-fi out of my computer LordFrancis Linux - Distributions 2 11-01-2004 05:52 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration