Developers of CentOS- shameful absence of any testing, rendered systems unbootable
Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Duck head in sand. Of course, it's users' fault. It can't be otherwise. That same piece of software failed in both virtual and hardware installations tells you exactly nothing?
Nope, not a thing.
What did you do to install? What version? What hardware were you using? What failed? What was in the logs?
For the information you DID provide, you were given suggestions on what to do to correct the situation.
Actually, you haven't desribed how the software "actually fails in pretty spectacular ways".
No error messages, unwilling to back out known experimental applications, and just saying the software doesn't work.
Nothing that can contribute to understanding your problem or to generate helpful responses.
I actually did. And that was immediately labeled as users' fault. I asked a question about possible venue to resolve this. No joy. Now that even virtual install failed, it's still users' fault. If someone else kept blaming you for failures in both scenarios, would it make any sense to you?
You have not said anything at all about "how" it fails and continue to ignore requests for the smallest useful detail.
You only repeat, "Does too! Does too! Does too" like a child demanding attention.
Your posts also demonstrate a total lack of regard for truth that might cause some presidential candidates to blush.
Others here are still offering to help if you will interact with them. I myself, am done and would like to see this thread closed if your current rather infantile behavior persists.
I actually did. And that was immediately labeled as users' fault. I asked a question about possible venue to resolve this. No joy. Now that even virtual install failed, it's still users' fault. If someone else kept blaming you for failures in both scenarios, would it make any sense to you?
Actually, yes. It would have told me I was doing something wrong, and would then ask how to try to correct that, or where to go to learn more about why it was the wrong thing to do.
The simple answer is that using the wrong drivers for something will not work, assuming it is a driver that is failing.
I have done that - but I also looked at the error messages reported, Googled for additional information, and found out what I had done wrong.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.