Linux - CertificationThis forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux certification.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
As of right now you don't have to reup for the cert. The Linux+ is still under the 2004 objectives. I would rather take the Linux+ over LPI. I've been looking over Linux+ material for awhile, but have yet to take the exam. I need to get on the ball!!!!
I took the Linux+; the only advice I have is to study from more that one source (I recommend 3).
The Sybex book is ok...but some of the stuff that was on the test wasn't coverd in the book...let me rephrase that. It was covered, but not in depth. It's worth having...along with OTHERS (LPI was already mentioned...)
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Rep:
I signed up to take my Linux+ exam on 10/31 (Halloween). I am only using one book, which is the new CompTIA Linux+ book from McGrawHill by Robb H. Tracy. Seems like a pretty straightforward and basic exam. I'll let you guys know if I pass, but so far the practice tests in the book are pretty simple.
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Rep:
I am back from my Linux+ test and I passed with 830/900.
It is a tricky test because it is not distribution specific. My advice would be to use CentOS or Fedora Core as your test system and get very familiar with the BASH shell. Forget Debian/Ubuntu because there were no questions that were specific to those distros, such as apt-get.
Also know about hardwares, which you may or may not have any experience using.
I'm off to my next certification, which may be either RHCE or Microsoft SQL.
Distribution: LinuxMint, Ubuntu Server, RHEL7 (in the past: Ubunu, Debian, Suse, Fedora, RedHat)
Posts: 29
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micro420
I am back from my Linux+ test and I passed with 830/900.
It is a tricky test because it is not distribution specific. My advice would be to use CentOS or Fedora Core as your test system and get very familiar with the BASH shell. Forget Debian/Ubuntu because there were no questions that were specific to those distros, such as apt-get.
Also know about hardwares, which you may or may not have any experience using.
I'm off to my next certification, which may be either RHCE or Microsoft SQL.
congratulations and good luck for the future certs
I was really waiting your feedback on the course...and i think that any future feedbacks from people that took the test are welcomed
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Rep:
Thanks! I have to say that this LInux+ test, in opinion, was very basic. If you are comfortable using ONLY the command line, then you shouldn't have too much problems with this Linux+ test. HOWEVER, there were some things that I never encountered or have used on my systems. FOr example, PCMCIA cards, scanners, modems, or SCSI drives. I've never set any of those up on my machines so those questions were really tricky. Also, things like I/O and IRQ's are things I have never had to deal with so questions about those were tricky.
In a nutshell, I would say save your $230 and go for a more advanced Linux test, like RHCE. The only reason I took the Linux+ was because my work paid for it and it was a good test to see how much I knew about Linux.
Distribution: LinuxMint, Ubuntu Server, RHEL7 (in the past: Ubunu, Debian, Suse, Fedora, RedHat)
Posts: 29
Original Poster
Rep:
can you tell me more about the test?
There are 90 questions, right? in how much time?
Are the questions single or multiplec choise? and if multiple, does it say how many answers must you choose?
Can you go back to another question? (and personal opinion, SHOULD you go back, or just give you best answer at the moment and concentrate on the rest of the question). Are there any other kind of question? (fill in the blank, drag an drop, simulation...stuff like that)
Is there a simulator of the test somewhere? (like the one Cisco provides for their exams)
Thanks again
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Rep:
There are 98 questions. You get about 90 minutes to complete the test, which I found to be more than enough time. THe questions are REALLY short. For example (not a real question from the test):
What is the command to view files and directories?
a) ls
b) rm
c) mv
d) view
The questions are literally one sentence and are ALL multiple choice with only ONE answer. No multiple answers.
You can go back, forward, and mark questions for review so you can come back to them. DO NOT LEAVE ANY QUESTIONS BLANK
There are no simulations or scenarios like the Microsoft tests. It is very straight forward, direct questions.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.