GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
We hear about changes in the Linux kernel as they occur, what with 2.4 and 2.6 and all the advances taking place in them. But one never hears about the Windows kernel (or whatever equivalent it has). Indeed, since Xpee was released so long ago, would it be fair to assume that Windows uses a very old kernel, considering that Linux must have had 2.2 then (forgive me if I am wrong about the number, but the idea is fairly clear)?(!)
Any microsoft Windows product based off of NT, uses the kernel NTOSKRNL.exe They enlarge it (cause I don't want to claim that it gets patched) using service packs and the Windows Update website. The version number for NT has followed this line
NT 3.5
NT 3.51
NT 4.0
NT 5.0 aka Windows 2000
NT 5.1 aka Windows XP
if you type the command "winver" it will tell you what you are running. There are also build codes to tell you how unstable your version of XP is. For instance, if you buy it from a college volume license, you probably have build 2600. No activation but it is buggy as hell
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.