GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Knoppix, Kubuntu, Gnoppix, Slax, Windows 98 & XP
Posts: 54
Rep:
Holy Cow! Fast Downloads!
I've never noticed before, but the downloads are fast on Linux. when i was on xp it would only go about 128kb a sec for downloading Suse leaving the download at a 55hour or so download. I go on linux and download and a might 400kb sec surprises me leaving a 20min!!!! download. Is this just me or is this what linux is ment to do?
in terms of running programs, (dependigng on the distro) linux usuall is faster and more repsonsive than windows.. (especially if you use gentoo) but things like downloads are usually limuted to your hardware bandwidth, or network congestion.
maybe you just happened to stuble across a fast serrver when in linux ?
Quote:
I have a dream of a mega OS with the logo of a penguin sitting on a window sill eating an apple. If this is a good idea contact me.
lol... what would this mega OS be like ?
stability and speed and freedom of linux..... the monopoly of windows (which would have been aquired honestly, with quality software, and never abused to smak down the little guy, infact, used to help its competitors) and the.... um..... what does apple have to offer ?
he was talking about mixing the OS's not the hardware
but seriously,, what does apple offer that a combinaton of win + lin doesnt..and dont say the Apple mac.. cos some linux distros are compiled for the smac.
Wow, I just hate Mac. Apple is even worse then MS: Microsoft wants to monopolize the software market, and Apple goes beyond it, not only the Software, but also wants to tell us which Hardware we have to use...
I'm glad MS surpassed Apple in the past... I really am, not only because MS is better in terms of what you can run, besides Photoshop, but Apple's products has always been way over-priced
Last edited by Mega Man X; 08-15-2004 at 02:42 AM.
Originally posted by Megaman X Wow, I just hate Mac. Apple is even worse then MS: Microsoft wants to monopolize the software market, and Apple goes beyond it, not only the Software, but also wants to tell use which Hardware we have to use...
I'm glad MS surpassed Apple in the past... I really am, not only because MS is better in terms of what you can run, besides Photoshop, Apple's products has always been way over-priced
finally, someone that agrees with me.
i saw a pic on the cover of a pc mag that was pretty cool. it had a penguin with a little sword on its tiptoes trying to hit "goliath" and goliath had a huge sword and was cutting an apple in half. so true, and so glad that it is. whats worse than apple is probably the apple fanboys. god i cant wait for apple to go bankrupt.
anyway, downloads on linux arent faster. its called placebo (heroin works too). maybe its kb vs kB?
i used to have a crappy win (software) dialup modem.... and presumably cos of the diseased state windows was in, the downloads went approxamatly twice as fast in linux. but it was a piece of crap modem.
The downloads in Windows before XP were a bit slower than in Linux. The Windows TCP/IP code sucked. They changed it for XP, though. As I recall, they copied the BSD(or was it BeOS?) TCP/IP code bit for bit.
Originally posted by coasterfreak212 I've never noticed before, but the downloads are fast on Linux. when i was on xp it would only go about 128kb a sec for downloading Suse leaving the download at a 55hour or so download. I go on linux and download and a might 400kb sec surprises me leaving a 20min!!!! download. Is this just me or is this what linux is ment to do?
What kind of connection do you have? Have you every tried speed testing it?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.