Do we need to make Linux (etc.) more non-geek friendly?
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Maybe it needs to be changed slightly to accommodate the fact that more and more people are seeing OSS, which still seems to be aimed more at geeks and those who have an idea what they're doing.
(Yes, I know the guy could have been a little calmer and friendly. Kudos to the poor guy who had to deal with that.)
So, does anyone else think that *nix , etc. software could be made slightly more friendly to those without the experience. Or am I just going soft?
A page very much like that appears if you install Apache on Winders. Would that have made a difference?
It's not unfriendly, except to tech-illiterates and city managers. Maybe if he'd called IT and asked...
No, much better to running circles waving your arms - better for the press that is.
I fail to see the problem with that page. It seems perfectly fine to me.
As for whether or not "we" (whoever that is) needs to make things more user friendly, that depends upon what "we's" goals are.
If "we" wants to aim for the newbie or less tech savvy public, then 'we" needs to design their OS and software accordingly. If "we" are aiming for the more geeky among us, then it isn't an issue and "we" couldn't care less about dumbing things down.
I would venture to say that the current state of distros available pretty well covers that spectrum already.
Linux does NOT need to become more "friendly". Linux is bigger in the server market than it is on the desktop, and in the server market friendliness is no substitute for scalability and advanced configuration options.
Now desktop-centric things such as Gnome, KDE, GUI package managers, etc etc... Sure, some of those could be more "friendly".
BTW, Apache has little to do with GNU/Linux other than the fact that it runs on it, among other platforms.
most windbloz users do not work on there systems any way
almost all windbloz users don't know a bit from a byte
why should linux be dumbed down to the levle where some
one who dose know what they are doing with a system has to
crawl through miles of lizards to do what could be done
with just a few commands as things stand now
the simple answer isn't just NO it's
HELL NO!!!
thank god that the nix system programmers
use the systems they program for
most windbloz users do not work on there systems any way
almost all windbloz users don't know a bit from a byte
why should linux be dumbed down to the levle where some
one who dose know what they are doing with a system has to
crawl through miles of lizards to do what could be done
with just a few commands as things stand now
the simple answer isn't just NO it's
HELL NO!!!
thank god that the nix system programmers
use the systems they program for
Crawl through miles of lizards???????????
Who do you think I am? Indiana Jones?
There's so much talk lately about making Linux easier for people who don't want to learn Linux. As always, you only get the maximum use out of something if you truly learn it. What do you get out of vi if you only know "i" and ":wq" ? Or Emacs if you don't read the manual? Nothing more than Notepad, really. If you want Notepad, that's fine; but some of us want more, and don't mind terribly working to get it. I just hope the technical people aren't losing their edge in light of all the "user-friendliness" discussions. (I know they aren't - they're just not as loud as everybody else.)
Crawl through miles of lizards???????????
Who do you think I am? Indiana Jones?
In My faimly I am the only one who dose know a bit from a byte
as a result I maintane all the windbloz systems
to track down even a minor problem requars going through
(wizzard) lizzard after lizzard after lizzard after lizzard
just to see how the system is configured
when the same problem on linux could be tracked down with
just a look at the log files fixing it is an edit of a file in /etc
and rerunning a script
linux is veary user frindly
it's just pickie about who it makes frinds with
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.