FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Not many add-on available for 64bit version Firefox. I'm looking for a software addon to Firefox which can zoom images on webpage simultaneously together with the text.
There's no advantage to running Firefox in 64-bit. It uses more memory and doesn't benefit from the 64-bit instructions. As you discovered, it also causes compatibility issues. There are really only a few conditions where 64-bit is of value (4GB+ RAM, video encoding, some scientific apps, some graphics apps). You want to use Firefox in 32-bit only. These issues are usually why I recommend installing 32-bit distributions on x86_64 CPUs for most folks.
There's no advantage to running Firefox in 64-bit. It uses more memory and doesn't benefit from the 64-bit instructions. As you discovered, it also causes compatibility issues.
Debian has document converting 32bit package to 64bit package. I came across it previously.
Quote:
There are really only a few conditions where 64-bit is of value (4GB+ RAM, video encoding, some scientific apps, some graphics apps).
I'm now running 2GB RAM, dual channel. It would be easy for me to upgrade the RAM to 4GB. RAM is economical nowadays.
I don't game nor do/run video encoding/scientific apps/graphic editing. What will be the advantage running 64bit OS paying money to upgrade the PC?
Quote:
You want to use Firefox in 32-bit only. These issues are usually why I recommend installing 32-bit distributions on x86_64 CPUs for most folks.
I'm now running 2GB RAM, dual channel. It would be easy for me to upgrade the RAM to 4GB. RAM is economical nowadays.
I don't game nor do/run video encoding/scientific apps/graphic editing. What will be the advantage running 64bit OS paying money to upgrade the PC?
At 4GB, some machines (depending on the chipset) will see about 3.4GB in 32-bit mode. To regain the additional memory, you need to run in 64-bit mode. However, it's really of little value, as all addresses/pointers double in size in 64-bit mode, reducing the available memory. Above 4GB, 64-bit should be used. However, unless you frequently run multiple virtual systems, it sounds like you have little need for the additional RAM.
The performance can actually be lower in 64-bit mode, as applications are larger, take more I/O to load and they use more memory which can put pressure on cache. This is offset somewhat by having additional registers, but not noticeably for most applications.
I have a machine that does automated image capture, processing and video encoding. That machine benefits from an x86_64 distribution, but my other machines (used as desktops) do not.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.